IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web

Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> Tue, 15 July 2014 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E051A001D for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9RLaTcL1Gm-0 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22c.google.com (mail-qc0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 128611A000D for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id l6so5445142qcy.3 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=e7FDCIKsPkT6fNO55HvXQM3WPwXaYKsvgbA5lksTse8=; b=v/y3O29QKNlsVJGS0+dDQ5k+8TQD20CPMHDCOfDppZsbhkV8uJZRdxnqN+PJHxIHJ9 UN6g6sojTxJX6WWcoBci5Q7MhzZn1Hycd58BBDJqufwyRFRRO1wbY2sF7fWzR2n9MEEV n/yFIoODTlGwToOHE7PljonMpeBOlt4awohj+9fD2QDcmBOwNXQNF5z+DcQBua5pFZQb xwwar3blEKY65DSNwVJMqIIlBmkTwiMi4zi8Fyoyh7JWIzcfEaXsbM9H5SxzpkNZrZuS 0pD0bFkmKoTJbmYFc/owElXUgkBOVyXHnSwiZBX5uENqhLeqvUoXr1OFPD59mVuWpvaO smIg==
X-Received: by 10.224.2.196 with SMTP id 4mr35960762qak.60.1405450001186; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:6:3a80:77e:854b:c9f:86d6:fdf6? ([2601:6:3a80:77e:854b:c9f:86d6:fdf6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o10sm27285357qah.3.2014.07.15.11.46.40 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Jul 2014 11:46:40 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0E0A3629-062E-4BF2-8987-B5E549CE2F3F@istaff.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:46:41 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CB1762AE-F8BE-447C-95A0-D647001CF162@gmail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20140708142055.0d5fbb78@elandnews.com> <D1AC4482BED7C04DAC43491E9A9DBEC3998608C6@BK-EXCHMBX01.blacknight.local> <20140709161653.GM59034@mx1.yitter.info> <9B506E73B33873103AE5EC52@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20140709171401.GB2935@mx1.yitter.info> <53BD843F.1070304@cs.tcd.ie> <53BD84BB.7000002@meetinghouse.net> <53BDA867.7090701@gmail.com> <53BE602F.7020108@firsthand.net> <53BE6384.5030504@cs.tcd.ie> <53BE69D2.9070509@firsthand.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20140711000259.0cc016e8@resistor.net> <53BFD828.3070007@firsthand.net> <53C06E7C.4010903@gmail.com> <CAD_dc6ihUvV8SDkmoc3fGHWoOoR6nFhRz-=tgCjKnuNvRO2JXw@mail.gmail.com> <53C0F1D9.3090400@cisco.com> <53C17B5C.4090600@abenaki.wabanaki.net> <C5750A628D4D973F3C44F6DC@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <53C1B2C6.40501@meetinghouse.net> <72F8472D-2913-4BEC-9260-6DAC7791BBF8@virtualized.org> <53C1E977.4050306@meetinghouse.net> <C2727BEC-6E3A-45E7-A3C2-DD4A6F118ED9@istaff.org> <20140715164338.DD4681F86B4@mail-01-ewr.dyndns.com> <"4341AA4C-33BE-436B-9272 - 4BD87171A43B"@istaff.org> <A0AE8C76-1FF5-4B67-8F0D-D27E2FAE7927@standardstrack.com> <0E0A3629-062E-4BF2-8987-B5E549CE2F3F@istaff.org>
To: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/SsKm05QMhLjckQBdqIjWUQBathA
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:46:43 -0000

On Jul 15, 2014, at 1:52 PM, John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org> wrote:

> (However, I think much of the present IANA Stewardship discussion 
> should be focused on how to keep the current IANA model running in 
> a proposed post-NTIA world, since there's quite a bit of real-world
> reliance on it today)

+1, and as a related principle, the groups contributing the pieces of the final proposal to the current ICANN-convened "IANA stewardship transition proposal process" should be looking at all (and only) the changes necessary and sufficient for a robust, reliable post-NTIA IANA. Processes for improvement in the future are important and interesting, but also separate. 

From what I've heard here and in assorted other public meetings and discussion, this is the IAB's and IETF's intention in the ianaplan process. It seems like the right one, as long as the ability is preserved to evolve in the future as needed.


best,
Suzanne
(no hats)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email