IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web

Carsten Schiefner <carsten@schiefner.de> Wed, 09 July 2014 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <carsten@schiefner.de>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E441A040D for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pw5tMi5JEhQV for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.schiefner.de (www.schiefner.de [193.175.80.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44D1B1A03D1 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brln-4d0c0eb2.pool.mediaways.net ([77.12.14.178] helo=[192.168.220.73]) by www.schiefner.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <carsten@schiefner.de>) id 1X4xTM-0005pO-Al; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 21:24:08 +0200
Message-ID: <53BD96CD.3030402@schiefner.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 21:23:57 +0200
From: Carsten Schiefner <carsten@schiefner.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Lynn St.Amour" <Lynn@LStAmour.org>, "internetgovtech@iab.org" <internetgovtech@iab.org>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20140708142055.0d5fbb78@elandnews.com> <D1AC4482BED7C04DAC43491E9A9DBEC3998608C6@BK-EXCHMBX01.blacknight.local> <20140709161653.GM59034@mx1.yitter.info> <9B506E73B33873103AE5EC52@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20140709171401.GB2935@mx1.yitter.info> <F7FBC1F2-F1E5-4BAC-9B7C-F55F0069D9CB@LStAmour.org>
In-Reply-To: <F7FBC1F2-F1E5-4BAC-9B7C-F55F0069D9CB@LStAmour.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/YxsS8WMcdQL5vY_RqaE7GTOc5bY
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 19:24:12 -0000

Hi Lynn,

On 09.07.2014 21:18, Lynn St.Amour wrote:
> In thinking about how to turn this around, what if a few key people
> (say IETF and IAB Chairs) were to write to Fadi and some of his key
> advisors and suggest they reconsider their recent actions given how
> counter this is to so many principles.  ICANN senior staff may just
> not be aware of this.

that indeed might be the case - that's why I'd support your take on this.

It however puts another question on the table: how "senior" @ ICANN one 
does need to be to be or become aware of it *before* actually taking 
action as we have seen?

Best,

	-C.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email