Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web

"Lynn St.Amour" <Lynn@LStAmour.org> Wed, 09 July 2014 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <lynn@lstamour.org>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987F21A0BE8 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0TyvTmmBr_NV for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa11-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa11-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [68.178.252.106]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A7A1A03D4 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from isoc-rem-mbp2227.home ([96.237.230.184]) by p3plsmtpa11-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id QKJ21o00G3zMm3C01KJ3FZ; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 12:18:04 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: "Lynn St.Amour" <Lynn@LStAmour.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140709171401.GB2935@mx1.yitter.info>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:18:02 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F7FBC1F2-F1E5-4BAC-9B7C-F55F0069D9CB@LStAmour.org>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20140708142055.0d5fbb78@elandnews.com> <D1AC4482BED7C04DAC43491E9A9DBEC3998608C6@BK-EXCHMBX01.blacknight.local> <20140709161653.GM59034@mx1.yitter.info> <9B506E73B33873103AE5EC52@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20140709171401.GB2935@mx1.yitter.info>
To: "internetgovtech@iab.org" <internetgovtech@iab.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/ZXc1j4jc3GbVQLyYNZ5Yohju0jY
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 19:18:06 -0000

In thinking about how to turn this around, what if a few key people (say IETF and IAB Chairs) were to write to Fadi and some of his key advisors and suggest they reconsider their recent actions given how counter this is to so many principles.  ICANN senior staff may just not be aware of this.

And, maybe the CG should have a statement of "what good looks like" or of what one should reasonably expect from these processes.  This is where the IETF and IAB can help - you have far more experience with these types of community and consensus processes than any other group.

Lynn

On Jul 9, 2014, at 1:14 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

>  But I'm not sure this list is the right place to try to
> tell ICANN how it ought to run its process for figuring out the
> names-relevant transition of the IANA function.
>