Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 07 March 2014 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86271A0073 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 06:02:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5OIh_9B4fzPG for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 06:02:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [209.135.209.4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A151A0164 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 06:02:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F24349A4380; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 09:01:50 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WpCJ-ohqxfcw; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 09:01:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dhcp-b45b.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-b45b.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.180.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1327C9A4381; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 09:01:41 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <2BBB3E29-9405-48A1-B467-D7981ED7D040@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 07:58:21 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <68BD93CF-4767-4FBA-9E7A-F5B98D566513@vigilsec.com>
References: <53066F72.6080809@cisco.com> <CF2CB88C.1B2CA%alissa@cooperw.in> <53078600.3090104@cisco.com> <CF2CCDF6.1B3E7%alissa@cooperw.in> <53086568.7050707@cisco.com> <3FFD6830-DC12-4707-AE2B-0FE1F251B198@vigilsec.com> <530921E3.7060005@cisco.com> <DFC22E37-7FA1-4973-A804-73C00685419C@iab.org> <2BBB3E29-9405-48A1-B467-D7981ED7D040@cisco.com>
To: Chip Sharp <chsharp@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/ZZhWyrxV8h8enQihhEpBQuKUZ_s
Cc: "internetgovtech@iab.org" <internetgovtech@iab.org>
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:02:08 -0000

Chip:

> Question for clarification, is the Time Zone database operated under RFC2860?  I think so, but want to check.

The Time Zone database does fall under RFC 2860, but it have a special set of policies that govern updates.  Much is delegated; however, the IESG is the body that would handle an appeal if someone felt that the processes were not being followed.

Russ