Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meeting Last Week are Available
Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> Tue, 22 July 2014 19:51 UTC
Return-Path: <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7517D1B28A5 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_92=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2k5EMdvqRSdk for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97D8A1A0126 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id bs8so1042476wib.2 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=D5ZBOsJLhbK6K5L+CHt/ubS0wbeiWNRgxmzJZAk5PQ4=; b=BpHeoct5wdTnXbW534NPWrFTYiCgr3QKNzjf853QR69OPH4CrkErknD+1fwbbme5zK w84hUeEQLlgfGzDKJ940gLktgWpJHMqM/72XFthX3gJqNCSK5fBu+ry/YZqsASAqtZy1 JAPIoJTuE4GtfVxsgpOnPc+B5uB4D7G47Mm3udDy7LnCPxzruk9Ldx2YcBOgRLVif3PH +mhzcmsShQenZV7c0nh+HGjD9D9zxVo/8Zmx/FFrgdNk3VC2sSYRX82NHSDDh3k/ZIbl Tak8A1TGuV9iB0urg7kauii+5isF+7oLeA+f/KSdGpIV2JnV9oBChIQ59sYPu6l9hIwQ LJnA==
X-Received: by 10.194.86.225 with SMTP id s1mr37360292wjz.21.1406058664863; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.162.195 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20140721232728.0cc67788@resistor.net>
References: <A193D048-2B67-469A-93BA-C61BB362DA75@vigilsec.com> <53CD1E8A.1060804@acm.org> <CAD_dc6h_o9QNcj4O_6n78U1uDY_24OU1s5NRceUR_Dm97Q1ZdQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140721232728.0cc67788@resistor.net>
From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 20:50:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD_dc6geOVwGLvS79iX0+kZZxZzkT+PV4vYko=J80iQnRUJPmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0102fedc40adf404fecd8be8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/h_ASVPCQiy1jhk-xbz65lNLy2oQ
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meeting Last Week are Available
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:51:10 -0000
Hi SM, On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:20 AM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote: > Hi Seun, > > At 07:30 21-07-2014, Seun Ojedeji wrote: > >> This was one the concern i raised within the number community[1]. The >> thing is the process is trying to be organisaed however the attempt is >> making possibility of getting diverse contribution more complex and less >> probable. >> > > The concern in that message was about the process for the various numbers > communities. It isn't directly related to the protocol parameters > registry. I'll mention that I have previously reviewed numbers-related > requests in IETF drafts. Several persons who have posted on this thread > (and another one) have an interest in names. They didn't mention concerns > about the names side. > > I took a quick look at the proposed charter. According to that document > the coordination group will be acting as a clearinghouse for proposals > about the various IANA Functions. There is already some discussion in the > IETF about the process for the protocol parameter Function. As I am > already familiar with the IETF process I did not consider it as useful to > ask questions about that process at this stage. > > One thing that I found odd is why this discussion is taking place on this > IAB mailing list instead of the venues for the relevant communities. Well you are right about this; i posted here about numbers to qualify the "names" interest. On whether my concern was discussed in relevant community, well can i assume you are also subscribed on that AFRINIC IANA list, as it sure looks like the list is in listening mode ;).[1] The other reason why i do respond on comments that is of interest on any list is because right now there is no global space to discuss the transition process. For instance, the charter which ICG refer to as a draft and say is up for comment does not have a clear process on how they receive comments beyond the 3 communities. The charter indicates that its open and at the same time will receive contribution from the 3 communities; how about those who like to comment on names for instance but belong to the numbers community(it seem like a community based restriction to me). I had thought a global space will be maintained and the ICG will let us know that they are watching the list for comments. This is where I will get blamed for starting the (previous) off-topic > thread. > > Please note that I do not have any concern about the following. The > problem [1] is that the proposed (coordination) charter does not provide > much information about the process. From that document: > (c) Please clarify how the comments will be reviewed. > This is the summary of what i am trying to communicate. Cheers! 1. I have posted my view on the list about the numbers process in engaging its community and Adiel indicated he will check the possibility out with the other RIRs. Will be good to read your view via that medium also. > > Regards, > S. Moonesamy > > 1. I picked the first word that came to my mind. > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng <seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>* The key to understanding is humility - my view !
- [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meeting … Russ Housley
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Russ Housley
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Avri Doria
- [Internetgovtech] Cross community (was: Re: ICANN… John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- [Internetgovtech] off topic: labels (was Re: Docu… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Internetgovtech] off topic: labels (was Re: … Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Eliot Lear
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- [Internetgovtech] Policy aspects (was: Cross comm… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Policy aspects (was: Cross … John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Documents from the ICG Meet… S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community JFC Morfin
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Eliot Lear
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Russ Housley
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Avri Doria
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community John Curran
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community S Moonesamy
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Steve Crocker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Steve Crocker
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Eric Burger
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Cross community Jari Arkko