IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web

Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> Wed, 09 July 2014 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35E31B278E for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 10:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7G-mCIEmHibO for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 10:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x229.google.com (mail-qc0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37F7A1A0AE8 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 10:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id i17so2772027qcy.28 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 10:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NjXAifwiK+TmveogJ/Z+qMSiU4p7VSud6TN1mACmtA0=; b=ozXP+TtbROHKUq3cxnudwc0nf8BqZ/LXXMiqKAkWmVdO8FjnUr9UkeoNxn2dASKXcO Yr7LzhMc86/UdbxGxilcRQPLgkG8FZ3WUdIL0BadsQl09tQdstCg2v7LbaRE1mDOz1qC TDjIWpMwjvbcMgOqxjpvbKxAqCQ6nwgD5ktYTb6p0yNJrplM857GKYH9uyUAMGlTKKHr GaLZl9UCyS8ojaBY8fyc9OnmDC/y2eqzWd3TFHMfU226fC3jBVwCTOjSD+jX8PsyB/tJ Ox2bbJh9m13VuynAFeXzL344y/K8M+t2ziC/pfbXKirPLKV4cp/dYG4nH53tbYDlFM9I Kfjw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.137.135 with SMTP id w7mr71727670qat.52.1404927990405; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 10:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.147.15 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 10:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.147.15 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 10:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140709161653.GM59034@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20140708142055.0d5fbb78@elandnews.com> <D1AC4482BED7C04DAC43491E9A9DBEC3998608C6@BK-EXCHMBX01.blacknight.local> <20140709161653.GM59034@mx1.yitter.info>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 18:46:30 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD_dc6gx8_jQkBCdZ1jPS6iKHTpRmwyeAv-inirbZKofcEoO7w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2eb34cda54704fdc64991"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/nWLOsBJBNCJwqrkG-MZyA_TzPYM
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 17:46:33 -0000

It is just so unfortunate the way ICANN is "acting" up. Even if ICANN
needed a forum (which I open-mindedly reviewed as I thought it's okay to
have options) I don't see any motive to shutdown the mailing list...unless
it is an attempt to discourage a broader discussion of the subject matter.
One would expect that ICANN will allow the coordination team do it's job
and not interfere!
More so the forum is not even independent of ICANN content/usage policies
as Andrew rightly observed. It is my hope that the coordination team will
do the needful.

Regards

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 9 Jul 2014 17:17, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 12:55:05PM +0000, Michele Neylon - Blacknight
> wrote:
> > There's a lot of content, including a discussion forum, over on
> https://www.icann.org/stewardship
>
> Yes, and it's all ridiculous.  That site (or "microsite", as it's been
> styled) both attempts to impose ICANN policies on the global
> discussion about all IANA and pretends to be a single discussion point
> for the entire transition.  But as we heard in London at the ICANN
> meeting's session on the IANA transition, the way this should really
> be pursued is by working on the separate parts of the IANA function
> inside the concerned communities.
>
> So, we don't actually need a single site, or list, or anything to
> discuss the overall IANA transition.  The co-ordination group is there
> to solve that problem.  But if we did need such a site, it could not
> possibly come under ICANN's terms of service, which include a rule
> that one has to protect ICANN's assets.
>
> Were this not an IETF list (so we don't really have a reason to
> discuss the names-IANA issue), I'd suggest that ICANN should repurpose
> its microsite to facilitate the discussion in the names community.
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internetgovtech mailing list
> Internetgovtech@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email