IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web

Christian de Larrinaga <cdel@firsthand.net> Thu, 10 July 2014 09:43 UTC

Return-Path: <cdel@firsthand.net>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5661B27EF for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 02:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.39
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.39 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_UK=1.749, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BHDv7sn6_TVk for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 02:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bmtwo.vm.bytemark.co.uk (mail.firsthand.net [IPv6:2001:41c8:1:6062::d46e:bc35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 738651B27FE for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 02:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-No-Relay: not in my network
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=firsthand.net; b=DwHLzZMcUTnHs+983aZCV7lMEN/e/r/iBcJHL0XqtTAcK7tk80vE+gOWOJmqhGrxeWR1NEN5yAmRXgJRaTyDKu3qlIsx39A72gxv3T1U/ejCkHLjrsnTveW+kopzIJIW; h=X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type;
X-No-Relay: not in my network
X-No-Relay: not in my network
X-No-Relay: not in my network
Received: from orionlocal.local (host-78-147-2-204.as13285.net [78.147.2.204]) by bmtwo.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D022E0102; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 10:43:16 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <53BE602F.7020108@firsthand.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 10:43:11 +0100
From: Christian de Larrinaga <cdel@firsthand.net>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20140708142055.0d5fbb78@elandnews.com> <D1AC4482BED7C04DAC43491E9A9DBEC3998608C6@BK-EXCHMBX01.blacknight.local> <20140709161653.GM59034@mx1.yitter.info> <9B506E73B33873103AE5EC52@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20140709171401.GB2935@mx1.yitter.info> <53BD843F.1070304@cs.tcd.ie> <53BD84BB.7000002@meetinghouse.net> <53BDA867.7090701@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <53BDA867.7090701@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7968E588BED512C1AD9EAE1A"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/pAzuF-fe07EZlS6nZlQcMhbGfR8
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cdel@firsthand.net
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:43:21 -0000

Brian

The problem is not use of website or email it is that ICANN is going
well beyond the remit that the US Government set it to facilitate a
global dialogue to establish a post US governmental top down role.

ICANN has a vested interest in the outcome. It is not a neutral party.
It's conduct so far has determined the topics, the mechanisms, the
committees, the dialogue within those groups, the representation, and
now the communications tools all under its own direct management control.

This is not facilitation it is a blatant attempt to own the entire issue
from top to bottom.

The key response from IETF is some fraternal frankness that expresses
with clarity our requirements for Registry operations in future.  US.gov
has spoken now IETF needs to fill any policy void left for those
resources IETF is responsible for.



Christian



Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 10/07/2014 06:06, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>> Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>> On 09/07/14 18:14, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>>>> But I'm not sure this list is the right place to try to
>>>> tell ICANN how it ought to run its process for figuring out the
>>>> names-relevant transition of the IANA function.
>>> I agree. Which makes it even more of a shame that icann
>>> seem block-headedly intent on shuttering the mailing list
>>> where that discussion would be appropriate.
>>>
>>>
>> Kind of sums up in a sentence all the reasons that ICANN needs continued
>> oversight.
>
> Yes. I am very disillusioned by this. I agree with Lynn's suggestion
> about triggering some high-level messages about this, but it suggests
> that a watchdog with teeth is needed (and I'm not at all convinced that
> NTIA has teeth in practice). "Teeth" generally means having the power
> to fire people.
>
>     Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internetgovtech mailing list
> Internetgovtech@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech

-- 
Christian de Larrinaga
FBCS, CITP, MCMA
-------------------------
@ FirstHand
-------------------------
+44 7989 386778
cdel@firsthand.net
-------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email