IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Internetgovtech] [Ianaplan] FW: ICG Charter Open for Public Comment

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Sat, 09 August 2014 12:49 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82081ABB32 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 05:49:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fALQGPGxfYGz for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 05:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB8CC1B27CB for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 05:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1294; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1407588573; x=1408798173; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=c5wzh/qYKbv1r4qQ/gJISvVeTay4BDulIMUdsv8FaEU=; b=GOLk3fCFCnQ84/aibPda3s4ZNDSyjyIhzx/E/qgQgmBx3ahES2otMGph wS9ZnnspZzZ3Otd/SoPhp+9LI0UcXDPRynhNxErpkqs1+9IIszU0CGIu3 3FeeXqsOPOK/NQQPphzRRowplwGCluR6j8gs4ajUOMFbStbNRAZZgrGR2 w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqQEAKwX5lOtJssW/2dsb2JhbABZg1+DT8oVh0wBgSF3hAMBAQEEI1URCxgCAgUWCwICCQMCAQIBPAkGAQwIAQGIPq9vlTUXgSyNbTqCeYFTAQScL4cnjVSBZRuBXjs
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,832,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="137863418"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Aug 2014 12:49:31 +0000
Received: from [10.61.75.12] (ams3-vpn-dhcp2828.cisco.com [10.61.75.12]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s79CnVjL011999; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 12:49:31 GMT
Message-ID: <53E618DE.8060800@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 14:49:34 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, internetgovtech@iab.org
References: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNMEGBCJAA.rhill@hill-a.ch> <53E6164E.9030404@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <53E6164E.9030404@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/ptMbQIKXjfgTQbpj4s1mFKJVx6w
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] [Ianaplan] FW: ICG Charter Open for Public Comment
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 12:49:36 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Stephen,

Just on this point:

On 8/9/14, 2:38 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I think most of this has been rehearsed elsewhere but don't
> recall if that included these lists. Apologies if this is
> therefore repetitive.

We have encouraged people to come to the names, numbers, and protocol
parameters to make their comments.  Richard has done just that, as he
was asked to do.  We should stick to addressing the substance of his
comments.  For those who agree or disagree either with the draft charter
or Richard's comments, I think this is a good time to get those views
out in the open.

And thanks, Stephen, for yours as well.

Eliot

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT5hjdAAoJEIe2a0bZ0noz/SQH/jPJZWJT/3dNtam9v4/NoHDk
bcbPzqFeKpSl8gEE2k1FiIhXa9vHeGsbr8HTq97nTkCbBvN0OinLs6f9Be4pRs9L
Kcn9H7NaRVYE2PmqzN6EUFHm7FlnNAIkk9o4oEJLJxkTU6tIpVrH4TE/zda9ErOo
K1j9KIdcnBZXecyYHz6bvgsU/+wZpe/Fk1H/zUWs+kyz/KPcSr3I06jY61vVm8n+
l9bQDkULO3gDEt+/Q30WY8/6iNeiEWayafXJKEL/GDcVAexazEaL7EgsWVAWX0ML
gtUOmhUl5L/2AhvPjFX0CWpGexCwy8fVq8bUKs/2yDYcM9iG1n01y4glSHvwtDQ=
=8+27
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.2.0 | Report a Bug | By Email