Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries

Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> Fri, 07 March 2014 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6EB1A01EC for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 06:51:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZXfQ0nLaQxky for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 06:51:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49B21A0118 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 06:51:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ix-2.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:152:e89a:a0f:69be:996b]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD12C21E9D; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 15:51:35 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5319DCF6.9000600@frobbit.se>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:51:34 +0000
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, "Chip Sharp (chsharp)" <chsharp@cisco.com>
References: <53066F72.6080809@cisco.com> <CF2CB88C.1B2CA%alissa@cooperw.in> <53078600.3090104@cisco.com> <CF2CCDF6.1B3E7%alissa@cooperw.in> <53086568.7050707@cisco.com> <3FFD6830-DC12-4707-AE2B-0FE1F251B198@vigilsec.com> <530921E3.7060005@cisco.com> <DFC22E37-7FA1-4973-A804-73C00685419C@iab.org> <2BBB3E29-9405-48A1-B467-D7981ED7D040@cisco.com> <68BD93CF-4767-4FBA-9E7A-F5B98D566513@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <68BD93CF-4767-4FBA-9E7A-F5B98D566513@vigilsec.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jK7lT7bDjFP712ncASsdxFgnuIxQAmRKq"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/qMMjH8jGXh2dKA3p1uIcCb4e7aI
Cc: "internetgovtech@iab.org" <internetgovtech@iab.org>
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:51:43 -0000

On 2014-03-07 12:58, Russ Housley wrote:
> Chip:
> 
>> > Question for clarification, is the Time Zone database operated under RFC2860?  I think so, but want to check.
> The Time Zone database does fall under RFC 2860, but it have a special set of policies that govern updates.  Much is delegated; however, the IESG is the body that would handle an appeal if someone felt that the processes were not being followed.

There are, I think, a few other parameters that are sort of "corner
cases", like "IDN Practices Repository" that IANA list under "Domain
Names" <http://www.iana.org/domains/idn-tables> but if I understand
correctly is operated on direct request from ICANN (I might be
completely wrong here on how that registry was set up).

   Patrik