IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web

Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> Wed, 09 July 2014 19:43 UTC

Return-Path: <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F4E1A0421 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jQtOA4L_PQZN for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22b.google.com (mail-vc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30B921A041F for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id id10so8218568vcb.30 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 12:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Xh0mdB/qaeLzM8Xn4ecbwbkVWVXcGzE96W/pBbvjes4=; b=gUARkSGOG5f85kQFuLbndgFtUWM0nRefYeyvChzA+sCveHdayVCYgAPW0dSBvH/GtR 8e80iKl7KdaGmmghR/PNbOOlkW4TnSkOVK5dCHV/y0To5H/2mRLfXEizGhoP0IJqM/ea VshwsxZhissPx+CUsvacn3Gi9wlYiALHyZ0THDB/TvtZVTiSSDD6mMH1FTAGxb4ieAN9 jDk3eIn8xfMkyFYkixK2SyQiYTueBUdb0k5eZRpopcqDAfuGrs2Na9Jn3qtCBRMFN4Om Rdmm5B5XuapjvnAK4BcEQ5wGHDnhGkVJRkshgL0KMu5xw2H601rQrxVBUzDLTXP1nVK+ e0cg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.44.20 with SMTP id y20mr2056867vce.60.1404935005242; Wed, 09 Jul 2014 12:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.147.15 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.147.15 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53BD96CD.3030402@schiefner.de>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20140708142055.0d5fbb78@elandnews.com> <D1AC4482BED7C04DAC43491E9A9DBEC3998608C6@BK-EXCHMBX01.blacknight.local> <20140709161653.GM59034@mx1.yitter.info> <9B506E73B33873103AE5EC52@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20140709171401.GB2935@mx1.yitter.info> <F7FBC1F2-F1E5-4BAC-9B7C-F55F0069D9CB@LStAmour.org> <53BD96CD.3030402@schiefner.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 20:43:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD_dc6hS3UYQfB00ctzCtnWRDp3NkWR=GcQfVbZ6WBzo3MeXOQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>
To: Carsten Schiefner <carsten@schiefner.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b3a98d0eb8e5604fdc7eb22"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/qpsI2apUxfaivGdlXaZpih0K-wA
Cc: "Lynn St.Amour" <Lynn@lstamour.org>, internetgovtech@iab.org
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] Transition to the web
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 19:43:28 -0000

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 9 Jul 2014 20:24, "Carsten Schiefner" <carsten@schiefner.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Lynn,
>
>
> On 09.07.2014 21:18, Lynn St.Amour wrote:
>>
>> In thinking about how to turn this around, what if a few key people
>> (say IETF and IAB Chairs) were to write to Fadi and some of his key
>> advisors and suggest they reconsider their recent actions given how
>> counter this is to so many principles.  ICANN senior staff may just
>> not be aware of this.
>
>
> that indeed might be the case - that's why I'd support your take on this.
>
Although I doubt this could be the reason because I won't expect such
decision to be taken by junior ICANN staff as those would just be
implementers. Also there are quite senior ICANN folks on that list which
should remove the doubt of their awareness. Nevertheless, one could reason
with your assumption for benefit of doubt.

> It however puts another question on the table: how "senior" @ ICANN one
does need to be to be or become aware of it *before* actually taking action
as we have seen?
>
More like don't be senior if you want to be aware ;)... lol

Cheers!
> Best,
>
>         -C.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internetgovtech mailing list
> Internetgovtech@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email