IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Internetgovtech] an initial proposal wrt IANA developments

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 20 March 2014 18:27 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BA71A0410 for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dUq9dsi1m0fn for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DF81A0429 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25BD2CEB6; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 20:26:47 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fEH9f_gLeC8j; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 20:26:47 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C942CCD0; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 20:26:45 +0200 (EET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgSXy-i5P1k0006hsuG0MCaT+6LUNemB3m1RT=9oG+1BDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 02:26:44 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B80F6D1D-A4B7-4054-8E8B-2F1CE031229F@piuha.net>
References: <CAL02cgSXy-i5P1k0006hsuG0MCaT+6LUNemB3m1RT=9oG+1BDA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/wb34MwyEfzKkJ9RvDN95N72BWkE
Cc: internetgovtech@iab.org
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] an initial proposal wrt IANA developments
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:27:01 -0000

Richard,

I agree of course that we should reaffirm our processes, and that continuous efforts should 
be directed to strengthening those processes irrespective of the the NTIA's decision. And I 
think that is exactly what has been going on. One small example of this is that the new 2014 
SLA between IETF and ICANN's IANA function specifies a public audit to be performed, to 
ensure that policies have been followed when allocations have been made. That is the kind 
of improvements that I think we do need. And with the Internet's ever growing importance, 
this is even more important that everyone can be satisfied that appropriate checks and 
balances are there. And it is also important to not just have this machinery, but to also be
able explain and show it to everyone who is interested - particularly now that there is
a lot of attention on IANA.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email