[Ioam] IOAM Work Moving Forward

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Thu, 16 February 2017 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ioam@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ioam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C46129640 for <ioam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:57:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.022
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.022 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EyrZFRNH-7cR for <ioam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:57:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7A5F1295D9 for <ioam@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:57:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7610; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1487264257; x=1488473857; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=dxMUKfTsoUO1acXCQLmx0xj6w3xa8zub8+z4bIsYPDA=; b=ZUoSyYs9a0RKhVdIciwYFjY6wr+UbSDIuGQo9ChLgonJ6ko12TvZnm2I SmVUH519S6xrfqF88kXSrz3uOlY/AtwnQpf66eoRUMvIb//baKV52/rsf jQfWyG0AW9ewONlZ/k/tVRrs/+qqvae3SO93B+Jfa2Aes1fH+Izt9LWyk Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CmAQB42aVY/5ldJa1eGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgm9iYYEQg1KKCKIXgx2CD4IMhj6Bcj8YAQIBAQEBAQEBYh0LhRpoAUoCBDAnBIl/oHCQBYIlK4sRAQEBAQEBBAEBAQEBAQEBIIZMggWKRC6CMQWVXIYjAYlJiE2Be4UXiXSTFwEfOIEAURU9EQGGMoofgQ0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,169,1484006400"; d="scan'208,217";a="386538419"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2017 16:57:37 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (xch-rcd-004.cisco.com [173.37.102.14]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1GGvatA007297 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ioam@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:57:37 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-004.cisco.com (173.37.102.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:57:36 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:57:36 -0600
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "ioam@ietf.org" <ioam@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IOAM Work Moving Forward
Thread-Index: AQHSiHXGRUbf8VhctECDRFBPmooW1A==
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:57:36 +0000
Message-ID: <D6A07644-3D48-4BF3-B4E5-8951A82A5951@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1e.0.170107
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.3]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D6A076443D484BF3B4E58951A82A5951ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ioam/PJGi3cREP_Wve7cpNjCMeECB6Uc>
Subject: [Ioam] IOAM Work Moving Forward
X-BeenThere: ioam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion on In-Situ OAM <ioam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ioam>, <mailto:ioam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ioam/>
List-Post: <mailto:ioam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ioam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ioam>, <mailto:ioam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:57:39 -0000

Hi!

First of all, thank you all for the interest expressed in this topic and the discussions about the charter.

As you know, one of the discussions resulting from the Internal Review of the proposed IOAM charter was whether the work was already within the ippm WG scope or not.  Over the last couple of days, I have dug deeper into that question with the Transport ADs and the ippm WG Chairs, and our conclusion is that there is significant overlap between the current ippm Charter and the proposed IOAM work.  Enough to justify moving the work forward in the ippm WG and not splintering a related effort into a new WG.

I have then stopped the chartering effort for a new WG.  The proponents will start discussions on the ippm list soon – please join if you’re not there already.  I will keep this list open for a couple more days.

Clearly there is interest in developing this cross-area work in the IETF.  I hope that you will continue to participate as the topic progresses on the ippm WG.  It is important that this type of cross-area efforts be properly discussed and that we don’t create more silos.  I realize it took us a couple of tries to find what I think is a stable home for the IOAM work – I know that the open discussion has only helped the overall process.

Thanks!

Alvaro.