Re: [iola-conversion-tool] Bug when Adding a document to the tracker

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 23 February 2012 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D928021F87C3; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:17:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.486
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.486 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.113, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zSmoZTF8zqhx; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:17:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2454621F8736; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:17:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unexplicable.local (pool-71-170-125-181.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.170.125.181]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q1NFHU06089831 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:17:30 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4F46588A.2000200@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:17:30 -0600
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ole Laursen <olau@iola.dk>
References: <4F4415E7.9080608@nostrum.com> <CANb2OvKXRUarNY-Vp+CkA+7P5FZ1=_OfqyO67gOnKfx2bAARCQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F455B47.3040305@nostrum.com> <F3883977-5295-48A7-A226-ABCA5563A2A3@vigilsec.com> <4F45B07F.7080508@nostrum.com> <CANb2OvKJy=HT34KNFXFzN+3V6L33SgxUfxrrh_H2XufXPe6nXQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANb2OvKJy=HT34KNFXFzN+3V6L33SgxUfxrrh_H2XufXPe6nXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020504060701090206050200"
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 71.170.125.181 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [iola-conversion-tool] Bug when Adding a document to the tracker
X-BeenThere: iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the IOLA / DB Schema Conversion Tool Project <iola-conversion-tool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iola-conversion-tool>
List-Post: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:17:32 -0000

Well, we should circle back with Henrik on this then.

On 2/23/12 8:20 AM, Ole Laursen wrote:
> 2012/2/23 Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com 
> <mailto:rjsparks@nostrum.com>>
>
>
>             3.2.1 New Items
>
>     draft-snell-atompub-tombstones
>     <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-snell-atompub-tombstones/>
>     [txt] <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-atompub-tombstones-14.txt>
>     The Atom "deleted-entry" Element (Informational)
>     Token: Peter Saint-Andre (gen area)
>
>
> Ah, hang on there. This is actually the single place I was referring 
> to before where the set area_acronym is used. So it says "gen" because 
> "gen" was set when it was added. You can't see this elsewhere, and it 
> won't work for searching either (actually, searching for gen area in 
> the production system does find this document but this is because it's 
> an invididual submission, and those are classified under gen for some 
> reason).
>
> I think there used to be a special handling of area in the edit form 
> in the Perl code base and the first port of it, that would put 
> individual submissions in gen and hide the area if it had already been 
> assigned. So if you're wondering why it's in gen and not in app, that 
> may be the cause.
>
>
> Ole