Re: [iola-conversion-tool] "Intended std level" on Add/Edit screen

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 22 February 2012 21:23 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA60B21E8034 for <iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:23:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.098, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lzE78wVmwwx8 for <iola-conversion-tool@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:23:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7FD21E801F for <iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:23:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dn3-177.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q1MLNAWb019386 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:23:10 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4F455CBE.1040809@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:23:10 -0600
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ole Laursen <olau@iola.dk>
References: <4CD06DE3-74CE-42A1-B000-B7C593875EF8@amsl.com> <CANb2Ov+yUwG31SJqHpf4559T3r6x87Hqwe+BvNr1BtL1T8Tw2g@mail.gmail.com> <4F44F940.5040000@levkowetz.com> <4F455380.6060004@nostrum.com> <4F45543E.4090401@levkowetz.com> <CANb2OvJGwSsMqSoifDGSXk5C2ZhppGYBomOkHWLTb7F_-WHaKw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANb2OvJGwSsMqSoifDGSXk5C2ZhppGYBomOkHWLTb7F_-WHaKw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [iola-conversion-tool] "Intended std level" on Add/Edit screen
X-BeenThere: iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the IOLA / DB Schema Conversion Tool Project <iola-conversion-tool.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iola-conversion-tool>
List-Post: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iola-conversion-tool>, <mailto:iola-conversion-tool-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:23:17 -0000

On 2/22/12 3:14 PM, Ole Laursen wrote:
> 2012/2/22 Henrik Levkowetz<henrik@levkowetz.com>om>:
>> On 2012-02-22 21:43 Robert Sparks said the following:
>>> The main document page currently labels this with " Intended RFC status:"
>> That seems good to me.
> Do you think "RFC status" is clear enough once it's not intended anymore?
Are you asking what to show on the main document page when you are 
displaying an RFC?
"RFC status" makes sense there. When you're looking at a version of the 
draft that led to it,
I would still say "intended".

If you're asking about the Edit Info form, we need to be careful - 
remember that we're going
to be adding (very soon now) the ability to issue ballots against 
changing this status (moving
from Proposed to Standard or to Historic for instance), and those are 
Intended status until approved.
>
>
> Ole