Re: [Iot-directorate] [E] RE: Question on IETF IOT-devices scope

["Chakrabarti, Samita" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Eve,

That's exactly the point of discussion.
Increasingly more capable  things are communicating with each other. Edge
IoT, Industrial IoT devices are not always sensor like devices.
-Samita

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 6:10 PM Schooler, Eve M <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> For some time, I have been wanting the IETF’s definition of IoT to mean
> more than constrained devices (Carsten is probably tired of me raising this
> point in T2T!). While constrained devices are certainly an interesting
> class of IoT, so are (i) low-latency IoT domains and (ii) Edge IoT contexts
> that generate lots of data and disrupt where the compute, control, and data
> management need to reside.
>
> My 2c’s,
>
> Eve
>
>
>
> *From:* Iot-directorate <[e-mail]> *On Behalf Of *Chakrabarti,
> Samita
> *Sent:* Monday, March 15, 2021 2:56 PM
> *To:* IETF IoT Directorate <[e-mail]>; Eric Vyncke
> (evyncke) <[e-mail]>; Ari Keränen <[e-mail]>;
> Ines Robles <[e-mail]>; Erik Kline <
> [e-mail]>
> *Subject:* [Iot-directorate] Question on IETF IOT-devices scope
>
>
>
> Hello All:
>
>
>
> In pre-IETF IOT-DIRECTORATE meeting, Ted Lemon has pointed to two
> documents regarding connecting the Thread Mesh networks to the traditional
> IP Infrastructure:
>
> 1) (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lemon-stub-networks-ps/
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dlemon-2Dstub-2Dnetworks-2Dps_&d=DwMGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=pWMzx7FsqijEJPyfMBfn-HJss-wVVTf0K5y-cxCTXL8&m=U0x-fzru1Ujordzrgva7COkP5xn3GtwG5JhhS2qtIw4&s=VqPca7CSWsZrskHVb-INw1VeP32Dxf15qmYBF4rmxac&e=>)
> - Problem Statement
>
> 2) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lemon-stub-networks/
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dlemon-2Dstub-2Dnetworks_&d=DwMGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=pWMzx7FsqijEJPyfMBfn-HJss-wVVTf0K5y-cxCTXL8&m=U0x-fzru1Ujordzrgva7COkP5xn3GtwG5JhhS2qtIw4&s=mAQ7UwXAQQoANvN4Y7RELbPXsvDPlevt24wcnpsvSq0&e=>
>        - A possible solution
>
>
>
> IoT-Directorate co-chairs and the responsible ADs would like to discuss if
> it makes sense to extend the IOT-Directorate charter towards less
> constrained devices such as some of the home devices considered as 'things'.
>
> The charter of the directorate says : (
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/iotdir/about/
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_group_iotdir_about_&d=DwMGaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=pWMzx7FsqijEJPyfMBfn-HJss-wVVTf0K5y-cxCTXL8&m=U0x-fzru1Ujordzrgva7COkP5xn3GtwG5JhhS2qtIw4&s=o0Owo7Uj2IPHX9RzrPvu0N3ChAjjoNLJPIZps8SL-_0&e=>
> )
>
> "The Internet of Things (IoT) refers to devices, that are often
> constrained in communication and computation capabilities, now becoming
> more commonly connected to the Internet, and various services that are
> built on top of the capabilities these devices jointly provide. It is
> expected that this development will usher in more machine-to-machine
> communication using the Internet with no human user actively involved."
>
> Should IoT-Directorate members consider Thread Mesh stub networks as one
> of topics under IOT-DIR scope of discussion or part of IoT work?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Samita
>
>
>
>
>