[Iot-directorate] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-16

Wesley Eddy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 30 June 2020 13:48 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Wesley Eddy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: iot-directorate@ietf.org
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider.all@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <159352488802.13614.9978604383483503310@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 06:48:08 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/KGPrkW0KJeW__Bf8gWaOXk0d4FY>
Subject: [Iot-directorate] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider-16

Reviewer: Wesley Eddy
Review result: Ready

This document is clear and easy to understand.

>From an IoT perspective, I don't have any specific concerns with it.  The CoAP
spec (RFC 7522) was written referencing an early version of this I-D, so it has
already been applied for designing IoT protocols.

There are a couple of small typos:
- In Section 4 part (1), there is a typo "an some" should just be one of those
words. - In Section 4 part (2), there is a typo "is is".

[Iot-directorate] Iotdir telechat review of draft… Wesley Eddy via Datatracker