[Iot-directorate] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-06

Loganaden Velvindron via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 19 April 2021 19:29 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Loganaden Velvindron via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: iot-directorate@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <161886057914.13531.4073159837988384862@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 12:29:39 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/YIJRsiMw1uBVBUBpvE_T_fosBu4>
Subject: [Iot-directorate] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-06

Reviewer: Loganaden Velvindron
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed the Internet draft as part of IOT Directorate.

Here are some of my comments. Please treat them as any other comment.

I have looked at an IOT implementation and it appears to be limiting sizes of
ipv6 extension headers and other IOT implementations appear not to support
extension headers.

I believe that this Internet Draft explains the issues around IPv6 Extension
headers extensively.

[Iot-directorate] Iotdir telechat review of draft… Loganaden Velvindron via Datatracker
Re: [Iot-directorate] [v6ops] Iotdir telechat rev… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Re: [Iot-directorate] Iotdir telechat review of d… Fernando Gont