IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iot-directorate] [Emu] Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-emu-eap-noob-01

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Sun, 12 July 2020 01:49 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: iot-directorate@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iot-directorate@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A713A0812; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 18:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5K5S9FNifKqn; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 18:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BE973A0811; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 18:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 06C1nnot021355 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 11 Jul 2020 21:49:52 -0400
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 18:49:48 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Mohit Sethi M <mohit.m.sethi=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>, "iot-directorate@ietf.org" <iot-directorate@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-emu-eap-noob.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-emu-eap-noob.all@ietf.org>, "emu@ietf.org" <emu@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200712014948.GR16335@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <159200881222.13853.13790945720958773822@ietfa.amsl.com> <962.1594228341@localhost> <cd4eb7c4-2780-2c10-9946-c44862deef73@ericsson.com> <DBE32082-A1B3-4D70-AD21-322AFFCE525A@tzi.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <DBE32082-A1B3-4D70-AD21-322AFFCE525A@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/loXd7VBTmbP73VXrRuSiPswIMjY>
Subject: Re: [Iot-directorate] [Emu] Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-emu-eap-noob-01
X-BeenThere: iot-directorate@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the IoT Directorate Members <iot-directorate.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iot-directorate>, <mailto:iot-directorate-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iot-directorate/>
List-Post: <mailto:iot-directorate@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iot-directorate-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-directorate>, <mailto:iot-directorate-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 01:49:58 -0000

On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 03:40:25PM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> Hi Mohit,
> 
> 
> > On 2020-07-11, at 15:27, Mohit Sethi M <mohit.m.sethi=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> > 
> > EAP-NOOB also relies on the JWK specification for encoding public keys. While CBOR equivalent is defined in RFC 8152, it is a rather large document that contains all the functionality of JWK, JWS, JWA (as far as I understand). Following smaller modular specifications was somehow easier at the time. 
> 
> RFC 8152 does have a section structure, so you don’t need to read all of it to just get the equivalent of JWK.

draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct and draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-algs have
section structure, too :)

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email