Re: [Iot-directorate] [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-core-dev-urn-09

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 07 January 2021 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: iot-directorate@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iot-directorate@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465533A102C for <iot-directorate@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 05:33:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VSq0cRmCM3Ue for <iot-directorate@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 05:33:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B9BA3A09D7 for <iot-directorate@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 05:33:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A740300B84 for <iot-directorate@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 08:33:14 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id wMVS-vcEaJsW for <iot-directorate@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 08:33:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 505C8300AE5; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 08:33:12 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJLQwa-yAR74qUGwFPo7JidGvCThsJHwuWSnx8gNr9n=9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 08:33:13 -0500
Cc: "iot-directorate@ietf.org" <iot-directorate@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-core-dev-urn.all@ietf.org, core WG <core@ietf.org>, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D6E40C4E-B763-4B52-B97E-DF02D46520E7@vigilsec.com>
References: <160996930502.21827.5533521556349871834@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJKKEgPRzkG18QAyOutGHO93zP=Hm2bBaF0qvE5j7r_dYw@mail.gmail.com> <A1152BE4-410F-4E2B-884D-DD5E62129122@vigilsec.com> <CALaySJLQwa-yAR74qUGwFPo7JidGvCThsJHwuWSnx8gNr9n=9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/s3WUj7cxCKFKWOOj58tD2cPF1PM>
Subject: Re: [Iot-directorate] [Last-Call] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-core-dev-urn-09
X-BeenThere: iot-directorate@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the IoT Directorate Members <iot-directorate.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iot-directorate>, <mailto:iot-directorate-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iot-directorate/>
List-Post: <mailto:iot-directorate@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iot-directorate-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-directorate>, <mailto:iot-directorate-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 13:33:18 -0000

Barry:

>> You are, of course, correct.  RFC 5234 says:
>> 
>>      ABNF strings are case insensitive and the character set for these
>>      strings is US-ASCII.
>> 
>> However, that raises a different issue:
>> 
>>   The DEV URN syntax allows both upper and lower case characters.  The
>>   URN-equivalence of the DEV URNs is defined per [RFC8141] Section 3.1,
>>   i.e,. two URNs are URN-equivalent if their assigned-name portions are
>>   octet-by-octet equal after applying case normalization to the URI
>>   scheme ("urn") and namespace identifier ("dev").
>> 
>> So, the ABNF should be changed so that the "mac:", "ow:", "org:", "os:", and "ops:" are required to
>> be lowercase.  I guess that means replacing each letter with the appropriate value in the %x61-7A
>> range.  That will not be as easy to read...
> 
> Not if it's done that way, indeed.  But RFC 7405 helps us here.

Indeed, I forgot about RFC 7405.  Much better solution.

Russ