IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iot-directorate] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-09

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Wed, 05 August 2020 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: iot-directorate@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iot-directorate@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B822C3A0CB5; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=OGRbpx9b; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=IihSTsSh
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3XqRz5L7Weo5; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EAFB3A0CAF; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=27558; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1596643806; x=1597853406; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=aGaE7WRRv6bait6QsRFGhrAobNNGcsSayMTIT3QkPSE=; b=OGRbpx9bKPoibdasPHp8rjnURX93MAziGa8lZ8w3Xwnkr2cfb+gCTnrw 6Fzo44Uz+la5hnYFYlO7nmaqTukCVXCUdUKbVIz7FpoqYggTpPim6c+kh talnjRus5Ff1KsczGNDJt3a5mct9VW9HVOWCt8HeOIJ459xjZLhTKo0y3 M=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,438,1589241600"; d="scan'208,217";a="790295763"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 05 Aug 2020 16:09:28 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 075G9Rjr028454 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:09:27 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 11:09:27 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 11:09:26 -0500
Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 11:09:26 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=fZpXJmG9StNB+/sI12tLJ/zZvQargl8f2Y/xsSClntB2f4T+QT19IJ7zRqL1m7sT47qT+lk8wUgqHCZt/+X1MHjiBti9QQ1PnoMCeFEbdhldBmnOzhup0Jsf0I5jysYebJgSi+j3VsRvYly1SjI3bwMIH14Jprn+C76qPOUagx3FPX1fxmTAANeGjG1MF7Z/rw5OU+Cr5PQ2OG5cqzb+v/7qsAKuXWARAL8uxtC3P8GIr7Fa3Z95xtzI6orpCClZwX/zZbXE25ikzoxUGuvIGaQk5zn+Rm7BCyCeVlGfPcGLlz0yS5TWz2/mjWENHN26lG8M7BbxUhn5glYF6SHd+w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=aGaE7WRRv6bait6QsRFGhrAobNNGcsSayMTIT3QkPSE=; b=afRZNlp29RO7rMy/89gKIfQ8c5uC70a/16ofOHpWL7g6yMvcBK3pj9wLxwN/FJ0FMlgFe15sqXj/MmtF9Hv131c66WFWUaD1tgA79mNXcYri20EzibN/MBuXigcetXw8e+afD3yNWZxSmEnDTMmn3BXh5Gb1Pd+D8VldgQ5JlbeZoi0wlytX/EPxNJZ49DraoYiUpHHwoNqG30pK8S6bdH8lc96bBbdQ6LWtpK8e7qJAVTMlMpvTPX+9fvr6lS1RakTZ3Q7pEKj7xfza3aMaywnpusmfhiCUw33UOL0qlPhU2rcdZdWrsNny/0tE0wifwGzmRF0SbyhO7p7Rd+K12Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=aGaE7WRRv6bait6QsRFGhrAobNNGcsSayMTIT3QkPSE=; b=IihSTsShihXlq6ky8NKCDxSSn0ZgO85ZvZRKlpWcq1QNb6TLGtzho3yYufxYmukF1scBAueqPQzFUAbhBAQKKy0SkGnoaqPkc8NAC7GYWvLkAo14djpNELg+0lvTCZ0hpUQb618GDfEwPd14cpaib2JE3xvDlQ9dvGFYrEfPIHU=
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:ea::31) by MN2PR11MB3856.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:ef::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3261.16; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:09:25 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a53e:5801:92cc:3204]) by MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a53e:5801:92cc:3204%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3261.018; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:09:25 +0000
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "iot-directorate@ietf.org" <iot-directorate@ietf.org>, Carles Gomez <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
CC: "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138.all@ietf.org>, "roll@ietf.org" <roll@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-09
Thread-Index: AQHWavnDeHVaGW91MUm0zwVCQmyTTakpL2vggAB5pQCAAAVkwA==
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 16:08:57 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 16:08:15 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB3565FE877078C68847A43CD9D84B0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <159661239313.30550.10499047705190236121@ietfa.amsl.com> <MN2PR11MB3565FFD7AECC524F6A1D6F8ED84B0@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESsyzgVFTpbnAAYkORv19Y=L=1DTknrJweJSDPzfh8tZmrA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsyzgVFTpbnAAYkORv19Y=L=1DTknrJweJSDPzfh8tZmrA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c0:1003::1a7]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 582e36d9-c864-4155-750b-08d83959ec7c
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3856:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB38560041411553E03B1A6B34D84B0@MN2PR11MB3856.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: nnWIezT4+YbvAakvGyFh6lg1NLV6+BUDrybR+E64VuKf4ngQ3vM4oGE/SYOtSKfM3IHPHYQqAjNJEcSD9wV2aEFMBz2nVv/flueCZ2h/L4beZysgyfJbhN9wN/Mn9nHpsYMUqFAIYpQrRk6dp2el22QE6KHOxsYj0csyHgmQR6Rj9VqQmuYoPvamoeHeQAsZZyZredAmy89F4+ThaLOv258+wAj5ude4eetA/GFop3SZ/67aQLI3zkodArl+LT+4BP8FHwcizL+YG8UxFP3Ypo2bsSnqlqdf8g0OJThjqz3wHlCN8e/JP9gglhJ8DOEcyVhnz+IA7qqYtcF9ebFZYHEECEbJ/FU0q2+klFe7MosHyOhb2bfSnVLX64V3oVaCfE9wGmx5BwnwFHpP4aEJrg==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(366004)(376002)(136003)(66476007)(66556008)(66946007)(66446008)(8936002)(4326008)(76116006)(64756008)(2906002)(71200400001)(6666004)(8676002)(478600001)(33656002)(9686003)(166002)(7696005)(316002)(86362001)(110136005)(54906003)(52536014)(5660300002)(66574015)(186003)(6506007)(53546011)(966005)(55016002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR11MB3565FE877078C68847A43CD9D84B0MN2PR11MB3565namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 582e36d9-c864-4155-750b-08d83959ec7c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Aug 2020 16:09:25.3588 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: AdPUPz9Rs7cQR2xVuMrcbLuRNU4hgyIatvg/t3ao29TsKh6BvPyF/S6zwSvgkZRGqSJjej2J9PvRZm9XYT6O5w==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3856
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/umKsrDNaDm4TA2KgXUYm8Tjas3Y>
Subject: Re: [Iot-directorate] Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-09
X-BeenThere: iot-directorate@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the IoT Directorate Members <iot-directorate.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iot-directorate>, <mailto:iot-directorate-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iot-directorate/>
List-Post: <mailto:iot-directorate@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iot-directorate-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-directorate>, <mailto:iot-directorate-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 16:10:09 -0000

Hello Alvaro and Carles

I published this new change as https://github.com/roll-wg/roll-turnon-rfc8138/commit/945b0aeaa63fb1b9b8320badc9215615bf8055fa
Are we good to publish v10?

Take care,

Pascal


From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Sent: mercredi 5 août 2020 17:46
To: iot-directorate@ietf.org; Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>; Carles Gomez <carlesgo@entel.upc.edu>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org; draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138.all@ietf.org; roll@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-roll-turnon-rfc8138-09

Pascal:

Hi!

The MOP currently has a value up to 7…let’s avoid more questions/confusion; please take the "(and above when extended)” part out.

Thanks!

Alvaro.


On August 5, 2020 at 7:35:07 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) (pthubert@cisco.com<mailto:pthubert@cisco.com>) wrote:



> - Section 3: “A MOP value of 7 and above”. If the MOP is a 3-bit field, the

> highest MOP value is 7 (assuming that the lowest value is 0). Why state here

> "and above"? Are there plans to extend the MOP field size?



Yes, there is. See https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-roll-mopex-01. This is why. Yet what you are saying makes sense, as written it cannot go beyond 7. I can change to "(and above when extended)"





> - Section 3, after “A MOP value of 7 and above”. s/MUST use

> compression/indicates that compression MUST be used



The following text

"

   Section 6.3.1 of [RFC6550] defines a 3-bit Mode of Operation (MOP)

   in the DIO Base Object.  For MOP values 0 to 6, the use of compression is

   as specified in this document.  A MOP value of 7 MUST use compression by

   default and ignore the setting of the “T” flag.



"

was suggested by Alvaro during his A-D review. But I believe that your proposal does not alter the meaning so I'm picking it.



Resulting sentence:

"

   Section 6.3.1 of [RFC6550] defines a 3-bit Mode of Operation (MOP) in

   the DIO Base Object.  This specification applies to MOP values 0 to

   6.  For a MOP value of 7 (and above when extended), the compression

   MUST be used by default regardless of the setting of the "T" flag."





> - Section 4, 1st paragraph: “if and only if the "T" flag is set.” Should we

> perhaps append “or if the MOP value is 7.”  ?



With the change above, I believe that we are good.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email