IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iot-onboarding] [Secdispatch] DANE IOT proposed outcome

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 17 November 2020 08:40 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: iot-onboarding@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iot-onboarding@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31C53A098A for <iot-onboarding@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:40:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8bMauxwoR4VX for <iot-onboarding@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:40:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 839863A0989 for <iot-onboarding@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 00:40:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D55389BA; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:41:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id XJ5Uf0oYZkD8; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:41:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14D6389AD; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:41:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E5CB20; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:40:25 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, "iot-onboarding@ietf.org" <iot-onboarding@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20201116144715.GL39343@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <2786E31F-2A4F-4901-8ECC-7AEF4B4D81E2@cisco.com> <b178d5066d6b4371a59ffe59bb6d6447@huawei.com> <A8214369-216E-440B-8757-172416CDF02B@cisco.com> <20201116144715.GL39343@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:40:25 -0500
Message-ID: <22484.1605602425@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-onboarding/-OOH1GXiA-NYdkyEXevGSPYT_E8>
Subject: Re: [Iot-onboarding] [Secdispatch] DANE IOT proposed outcome
X-BeenThere: iot-onboarding@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IoT onboarding mechanisms <iot-onboarding.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iot-onboarding>, <mailto:iot-onboarding-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iot-onboarding/>
List-Post: <mailto:iot-onboarding@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iot-onboarding-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-onboarding>, <mailto:iot-onboarding-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 08:40:29 -0000

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
    > I thought there where also mechanisms by which the thin (IOT) device
    > might only have a unique symmetric key that is only shared with
    > some less constrained proxy ("in the cloud") that is supporting
    > the thin device in all more complex (crypto)  operations and avoid
    > the need for the thin device to support symmetric crypto - if thats
    > the component beyond its capabilities.

Yes, for instance: draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security.
Stuck in Cluster C310.  I think everything is unstuck now.
Can be mixed with constrained-voucher/brski in the same network.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email