Re: [Iot-onboarding] EduRoam for IoT

[Eduardo Ingles UM <[e-mail]>]

Dear Sandoche, all,

Together with my colleagues, we have implemented EAP-NOOB and CoAP-EAP 
on Zolertia Firefly motes. This is the GitHub link: 
https://github.com/eduingles/coap-eap-noob

The implementation of CoAP-EAP as EAP Lower Layer is based on the 
previous work of my colleagues at the University of Murcia Rafa Marin 
Lopez and Dan Garcia Carrillo (GitHub link: 
https://github.com/eduingles/coap-eap-controller ).

Here is a demonstration video of EAP-NOOB with Firefly motes and 
out-of-band communication with blinking lights:
https://youtu.be/rPuFKoihl5E

Best regards.

El 10/12/2019 a las 14:31, Mohit Sethi M escribió:
> Hi Sandoche,
>
> I was involved in the development of EAP-NOOB during the early days.
> Back then, we had received a request from Rhys Smith and Josh Howlett
> (from JISC who are involved with eduroam in the UK) for adding roaming
> support.
>
> EAP-NOOB does support roaming. Please look at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-aura-eap-noob-07#appendix-D for more
> information. If you have some requirements that are not met, please feel
> free to suggest them to the EMU working group
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/emu/about/).
>
> I don't know the specific limitations of LoRaWAN. Our colleague, Eduardo
> (in CC), from the University of Murcia has worked on a light-weight
> implementation of EAP-NOOB in Contiki. I am sure he can provide you some
> pointers.
>
> --Mohit
>
> On 12/9/19 11:40 PM, sandoche Balakrichenan wrote:
>> On 09/12/2019 18:45, Michael Richardson wrote:
>>> Eliot Lear <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>       > I think what you are aiming for is a LoRa-enabled router that
>>> can do a
>>>       > radius transaction that has the appropriate federated wrapper,
>>> such as
>>>       > PEAP/EAP-TLS.  Will the LoRa device know its home network?
>>>
>>> At bytes/day?
>> ==> Absolutely.
>>
>> Alternatives could be :
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-aura-eap-noob/?include_text=1
>>
>> and evolving standards from the LAKE WG
>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/lake/about/) using a PKI
>>
>>> I don't think that it is network onboarding, but application
>>> onboarding that
>>> is desired.
>>>
>> ==> Application onboarding is for the LoRaWAN scenario.
>>
>> Don't we have the need for network onboarding for other IoT networks?
>>
>> The objective is to come with a generic solution, if possible.
>>
>> Sandoche.
>>
-- 
Eduardo Inglés Sánchez
[e-mail]

Department of Information and Communication Engineering
Faculty of Computer Science
University of Murcia
30100 Murcia, Spain