Re: [Iot-onboarding] Fwd: IETF 106 Hackathon

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Wed, 18 September 2019 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: iot-onboarding@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iot-onboarding@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9E812002E; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id USWN23sKY9SI; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DADF12081E; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF513897C; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:51:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F63560; Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:52:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
cc: mud@ietf.org, iot-onboarding@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <9C16D937-ECD9-4D0D-9C2F-86DFBAE0EA3A@cisco.com>
References: <2EDDCF70-D90E-4378-A337-86C507E7C43B@cisco.com> <9C16D937-ECD9-4D0D-9C2F-86DFBAE0EA3A@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 10:52:55 -0400
Message-ID: <26982.1568818375@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-onboarding/XUwgonBBACizyIBdSJKxKPeIdvs>
Subject: Re: [Iot-onboarding] Fwd: IETF 106 Hackathon
X-BeenThere: iot-onboarding@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IoT onboarding mechanisms <iot-onboarding.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iot-onboarding>, <mailto:iot-onboarding-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iot-onboarding/>
List-Post: <mailto:iot-onboarding@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iot-onboarding-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-onboarding>, <mailto:iot-onboarding-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:52:58 -0000

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>; wrote:
    > Should we all get together again?  If so, what work?  We’ll have a TEAP
    > implementation to play with, as well as plenty more mud work to do.

Pick one or the other.
Since I think that few of the NIST/NCCoE people will make IETF106, I suggest
TEAP-BRSKI rather than MUD.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [