Re: [Iot-onboarding] EduRoam for IoT

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Tue, 10 December 2019 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: iot-onboarding@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iot-onboarding@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F205F1200D6 for <iot-onboarding@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 07:01:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y4Rzr__QrOI9 for <iot-onboarding@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 07:01:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E51F81200C3 for <iot-onboarding@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 07:01:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F813897B; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:57:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E063B68B; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:01:14 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: sandoche Balakrichenan <sandoche.balakrichenan@afnic.fr>
cc: iot-onboarding@ietf.org, Guillaume Schreiner <schreiner@unistra.fr>
In-Reply-To: <c4f6ea01-4d52-7cd8-4cdf-b6f5714d1f95@afnic.fr>
References: <80fc1573-62f9-26a6-5b55-6ff33c0b1a94@afnic.fr> <62187F87-EC6B-4A34-ACDC-9E5BA5001A0E@cisco.com> <21488.1575913510@localhost> <c4f6ea01-4d52-7cd8-4cdf-b6f5714d1f95@afnic.fr>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:01:14 -0500
Message-ID: <22415.1575990074@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-onboarding/vBD_TqJWTATsAduQFqVIzXXXUpQ>
Subject: Re: [Iot-onboarding] EduRoam for IoT
X-BeenThere: iot-onboarding@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IoT onboarding mechanisms <iot-onboarding.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iot-onboarding>, <mailto:iot-onboarding-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iot-onboarding/>
List-Post: <mailto:iot-onboarding@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iot-onboarding-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-onboarding>, <mailto:iot-onboarding-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:01:19 -0000

sandoche Balakrichenan <sandoche.balakrichenan@afnic.fr> wrote:
    >> I don't think that it is network onboarding, but application onboarding that
    >> is desired.
    >>
    > ==> Application onboarding is for the LoRaWAN scenario.

    > Don't we have the need for network onboarding for other IoT networks?

    > The objective is to come with a generic solution, if possible.

Then, I think that you want a BRSKI based system, if you want to address a
large number of context.  I am skeptical that this can include LoRA.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [