Re: [Iotops] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-07

["Panwei (William)" <[e-mail]>]

Support +1


Regards & Thanks!
Wei Pan (潘伟)

From: Iotops [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Marco Tiloca
Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 3:13 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Iotops] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-07

Hi all,

This is a useful document and I support its adoption in IOTOPS.

Best,
/Marco
On 2023-03-06 12:50, Thomas Fossati wrote:
I agree with Göran, this looks like a very useful document and well in scope for IoTOps.

On 06/03/2023, 11:40, "Iotops" <[e-mail]><mailto:[e-mail]> wrote:

I support adoption. Before these side-by-side comparison existed, there were lots of erroneous claims circulating about message overhead for security protocols. Completing this document seems like a good way to mitigate that discussion from reappearing.

Göran

From: Iotops <[e-mail]><mailto:[e-mail]> on behalf of Henk Birkholz <[e-mail]><mailto:[e-mail]>
Date: Wednesday, 1 March 2023 at 19:30
To: IOTOPS Working Group <[e-mail]><mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: [Iotops] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-07
Dear IOTOPS members,

this starts a call for Working Group Adoption of

> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-07<https://eur05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-07&data=05%7C01%7Cmarco.tiloca%40ri.se%7C0dc36e469ec84e6c4faa08db1e39094c%7C5a9809cf0bcb413a838a09ecc40cc9e8%7C0%7C0%7C638137002545795243%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=e6pfdrwZX%2FrlBnKbA0NyOh5Ys9tNZyMO9jdv7CQ3UTg%3D&reserved=0>

ending on Wednesday, March 15th.

As a reminder, this I-D describes experiences with message sizes for
various configurations of security protocols. This can aid in selecting
protocols for specific constrained environments.

Previously, the I-D has been progressed in LWIG. There was rough in-room
consensus at the IETF 115 meeting to make IOTOPS its new home and move
forward with a WG adoption call, as is documented in

> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-115-iotops-202211081300/<https://eur05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fminutes-115-iotops-202211081300%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cmarco.tiloca%40ri.se%7C0dc36e469ec84e6c4faa08db1e39094c%7C5a9809cf0bcb413a838a09ecc40cc9e8%7C0%7C0%7C638137002545795243%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=1NAzAEG56mb%2FuSPBkr25zPHUQTGXH090vhF%2B16BZQMk%3D&reserved=0>

Please reply with your support and especially any substantive comments
you may have.


For the IOTOPS co-chairs,

Henk

--
Iotops mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iotops<https://eur05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fiotops&data=05%7C01%7Cmarco.tiloca%40ri.se%7C0dc36e469ec84e6c4faa08db1e39094c%7C5a9809cf0bcb413a838a09ecc40cc9e8%7C0%7C0%7C638137002545795243%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=eIw5%2ByOoPRd7ZW5bh8KPfU0FNyfbwSF9ZPkAiMPndPQ%3D&reserved=0>
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.




--

Marco Tiloca

Ph.D., Senior Researcher



Phone: [phone]



RISE Research Institutes of Sweden AB

Box 1263

164 29 Kista (Sweden)



Division: Digital Systems

Department: Computer Science

Unit: Cybersecurity



https://www.ri.se