IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iotops] [Uta] How should we change draft-ietf-use-san?

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 21 April 2021 07:34 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: iotops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iotops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADD13A18A3; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 00:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AEARce7O-uKc; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 00:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5815C3A18A2; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 00:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1178; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1618990467; x=1620200067; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=Bjm6oOYQtRrTnL2J7bIZjeqdioZPhiPiywz6iqG68Mo=; b=KCaIECgrRp0CBY9rX5qpxz60cW7XTu/Mf/uDFRYTLqRDSKJKK3e4fSNp 0908n/A0vbTOwI0kTmjYywbd9yntXyN4td4QFaKiRhvp04y/YLYxLLOyG xq36GX/Tj9CnYeSdzQsC4yFusi+skcq95Af0O+8WLOFsu6IBeZRJyJXWP I=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IPAS-Result: A0AOAADF1H9glxbLJq1aHAEBAQEBAQcBARIBAQQEAQGBfgcBAQsBg3cBJxKEdIgkYIhMKJBziXmBfAQHAQEBCgMBATQEAQGEUAKBdSY0CQ4CAwEBAQMCAwEBAQEBBQEBAQIBBgQUAQEBAQEBAQFohV2GRQECAgEjVgULC0ICAlcGgwQBgmYhp1R6gTKBAYRYhRAQgToBgVKMAkOCC4E6DBCCXz6HWTaCKwSCQAZooSWdDYMXgz+BRpgKBCGDPQGQe5BMtF2EBAIEBgUCFoFUOIFbMxoIGxVlAYI/PRIZDo44jjY/A2cCBgEJAQEDCY0PAQE
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:4bQK6aCft+DC9MvlHeku55DYdL4zR+YMi2QD/UoZc203TuWzkc eykPMHkSLlkTp5Yh0dsP2JJaXoexLh3LFv5415B92fdSng/FClNYRzqbblqgeBJwTb+vRG3a ltN4hyYeecMXFfjcL3pDa1CMwhxt7vys+VrNzTxXtsUg1mApsIh2xEIz2WHUFsSA5NCYBRLu v42uN8uzGidX4LB/7UOlA5WYH41r/2vaOjRRYHAhI9gTP+6Q+A2frdDwWS2AsYXndpx7ovmF K19TDR1+GEr+yxzAPa2ivoy6lu3PHlytdFGaW3+68oFgk=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,238,1613433600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="35259842"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 21 Apr 2021 07:34:20 +0000
Received: from [10.61.144.102] ([10.61.144.102]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 13L7YJxL004598 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:34:20 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <CE9E4A15-6130-4D23-A1CF-DDE7C5136F35@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AF1C5865-33FD-421E-99CC-A18E8F37CA33"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:34:18 +0200
In-Reply-To: <42739D1C-004F-4DAD-8023-8E9731B46E05@cisco.com>
Cc: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "uta@ietf.org" <uta@ietf.org>, iotops@ietf.org
To: Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <F538FFD7-D172-4AEE-82DD-CF6F93936C3B@akamai.com> <D341C730-EBA1-4BF5-B200-0BE1A4B8A1D0@cisco.com> <413CBCFE-1FDF-458E-9F0E-E3D58F86E5D9@bluepopcorn.net> <A5B94C6E-419D-454E-92E8-FEEB5F8EDE17@cisco.com> <8A41ED29-2448-4633-AC45-33DE98A6BC81@akamai.com> <7B51BB81-1C9D-4B2F-AF83-1E528E620AE7@cisco.com> <CAFewVt4Pm6-T3XC65uEceuzpXjNubEYLWY9h1cmHdNBPcpOVXQ@mail.gmail.com> <42739D1C-004F-4DAD-8023-8E9731B46E05@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.144.102, [10.61.144.102]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iotops/C6PrPG6k1SKsP0zPLKgfH9ITO3A>
Subject: Re: [Iotops] [Uta] How should we change draft-ietf-use-san?
X-BeenThere: iotops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IOT Operations <iotops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iotops>, <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iotops/>
List-Post: <mailto:iotops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iotops>, <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:34:33 -0000

One correction:

> What harm comes to any use case for there to be a non-default library flag, as Victor mentioned there is with OpenSSL?

The flag is there.  I don’t know the default state.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email