Re: [Iotops] Automatically connecting to stub networks...

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Thu, 03 December 2020 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: iotops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iotops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BF03A08DA; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 04:48:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Emycy77v_bg; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 04:48:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D1903A08C5; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 04:48:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CmwYK3BVJz67LP2; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 20:45:41 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.53) by fraeml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2106.2; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 13:48:04 +0100
Received: from DGGEML421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.38) by fraeml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.2106.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 13:48:04 +0100
Received: from DGGEML511-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.161]) by dggeml421-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.199.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 20:48:00 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: "iotops@ietf.org" <iotops@ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
CC: 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Iotops] Automatically connecting to stub networks...
Thread-Index: AdbJcmHVuL+YIanTQYOZyQxG9/eyaw==
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:47:59 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAADBDE6E0@dggeml511-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.101.103]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iotops/N4p2Dmg8SO9bQvZJDAyLzoJJl0E>
Subject: Re: [Iotops] Automatically connecting to stub networks...
X-BeenThere: iotops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IOT Operations <iotops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iotops>, <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iotops/>
List-Post: <mailto:iotops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iotops>, <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:48:58 -0000

    >> In answer to your question: State of the Art
    >> 
    >> Currently there is one known way to accomplish what we are describing
    >> here [[Michael, does ANIMA have a second way?]].
    >> 
    >> The ANIMA ACP sets up an overlay network with /128 routing via
    >> RPL(RFC6550) storing mode.
I am wondering how ACP+RPL is different from HNCP+Babel? Are they equivalent?