IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iotops] Question about updating drafts

Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org> Thu, 31 March 2022 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <msweet@msweet.org>
X-Original-To: iotops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iotops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DA63A11B6 for <iotops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 06:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=msweet.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rfwlexS1RxYb for <iotops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 06:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.msweet.org (mail.msweet.org [173.255.209.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E9B3A11E6 for <iotops@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 06:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (cbl-66-186-76-47.vianet.ca [66.186.76.47]) by mail.msweet.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A821681012; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 13:43:40 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.msweet.org A821681012
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=msweet.org; s=default; t=1648734221; bh=mjTIJZP//j8dK3pBJwKERG1iGgeC+SjzoTXBKpbl2HY=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=CFnQYzNdQ2iriFOT44dCxNjOZE9UsJx31B1VIiroFQutVS87ADsaLS7urBTERgSPC 4hMn0tjHISEjd1YTd9GBmxEFLKU3fd8oz4ohPs6QaphIfFs0A2vUIptExJ9sY+1hNv pmYcFDU6gp0UtOaO+/gH3oZCBWAbqxgbQfnGPSM8=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9C63DD76-FDAE-4808-B572-231202F6DDFE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.80.82.1.1\))
From: Michael Sweet <msweet@msweet.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAGJRHzBPLQwTg7=zkVp_PMM5w1KSBDhWA8R055ubDQ68BgBZQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 09:43:39 -0400
Cc: iotops@ietf.org
Message-Id: <F2D11826-132E-44DE-A885-EDF93F59B530@msweet.org>
References: <CAGJRHzBPLQwTg7=zkVp_PMM5w1KSBDhWA8R055ubDQ68BgBZQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sávyo Morais <savyovm@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.80.82.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iotops/Q_dpBP82V9Pq-EEmXKSSS9INbis>
Subject: Re: [Iotops] Question about updating drafts
X-BeenThere: iotops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IOT Operations <iotops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iotops>, <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iotops/>
List-Post: <mailto:iotops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iotops>, <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 13:43:47 -0000

Sávyo,

I skimmed the referenced draft along with RFC 8250, since I wasn't familiar with that work...  My $0.02 CAD is that if MUDs are being implemented by vendors then MTDs would be a useful addition.  But in the printer world we've only been talking about TNC and EAP for securing enterprise networks...


> On Mar 29, 2022, at 9:39 AM, Sávyo Morais <savyovm@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> I'm sending this email with an honest question about the minimum requisites for allowing a draft update.
> 
> Well, everyone knows that, when there is no more talk about one draft, it might not be updated. But the point for me is: what about it received only one or two comments? How much "not humming" is necessary for one draft to be discontinued?
> 
> Furthermore, after the answer to this question (or discussion about that), I would like to bring one concrete case to the table. In the past November, I've submitted a draft [1] and received only one comment on this list with a few suggestions for typo corrections.
> 
> Therefore, as the draft's expiration is approaching, I have doubts if I can update it based on those comments.
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-morais-iotops-inxu/
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Sávyo Morais
> --
> Iotops mailing list
> Iotops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iotops

________________________
Michael Sweet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email