Re: [Iotops] maintain ownership
William_J_G Overington <wjgo_10009@btinternet.com> Fri, 06 November 2020 09:29 UTC
Return-Path: <wjgo_10009@btinternet.com>
X-Original-To: iotops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iotops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E1B3A0FCB for <iotops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 01:29:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btinternet.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G3L0a6sDswFt for <iotops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 01:29:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rgout03.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (rgout0303.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk [65.20.0.209]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963CC3A0FC9 for <iotops@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 01:29:06 -0800 (PST)
X-OWM-Source-IP: 10.110.12.1 ()
X-OWM-Env-Sender: wjgo_10009@btinternet.com
X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean
X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0
X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean
X-SNCR-VADESECURE: CLEAN
X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0
X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean
X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedruddtledgtdehucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuueftkffvkffujffvgffngfevqffopdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepvffkjghfufggtggfihfhffesrgdtregstderjeenucfhrhhomhephghilhhlihgrmhgplfgpifcuqfhvvghrihhnghhtohhnuceofihjghhopgdutddttdelsegsthhinhhtvghrnhgvthdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveevgfduudevffeivdeuhefhudduvdefgfdvleeileehveehkeeguefhheeludehnecuffhomhgrihhnpehglhhosggrlhhnvghtrdgtohdruhhknecukfhppedutddruddutddruddvrddupdekiedrudehkedrudelrdefjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopeifvggsmhgrihhlfedvrdgsthdrvgigthdrtghptghlohhuugdrtghordhukhdpihhnvghtpedutddruddutddruddvrddupdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoeifjhhgohgpuddttddtleessghtihhnthgvrhhnvghtrdgtohhmqedprhgtphhtthhopeeoihhothhophhssehivghtfhdrohhrgheq
Received: from webmail32.bt.ext.cpcloud.co.uk (10.110.12.1) by rgout03.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.26-1) (authenticated as wjgo_10009@btinternet.com) id 5D42B51907DE1587 for iotops@ietf.org; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:29:04 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1604654946; bh=dpAIAFneiOkWsm6rTI84iS/5pLhbkcqHqgVAxA2+5O0=; h=To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version:From:Date; b=n7AG3mADvczxWv5gk1dWsykzJhVGHClLvq2/GdhwWgoWPg10YPuk/krKLLaVnn2aTe+uV5QIllvfFBWRN6dAbAhDXyh4aPZiJW2ZMLBgbL8tur/mrbCag1SPMxsfs1nkId2mbd1Wk/swuchRyVD120G9cukfLIYVAyTQZLFiTAg=
Received: from [86.158.19.37] by ux.btmail.bt.com with HTTP; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 09:29:04 +0000
To: iotops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <5aa50f43.f6.1759ce350e5.Webtop.219@btinternet.com>
In-Reply-To: <3bfc23ab.47.1759c92d025.Webtop.219@btinternet.com>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAADB1F8C6@dggeml511-mbs.china.huawei.com> <15665.1604430085@localhost> <20201103204823.GE48111@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <5254.1604514609@localhost> <EEF8A3ED-E57D-4F84-92DD-5C74123AFD91@ambotec.org> <20562.1604598209@localhost> <45ed90d2-28ad-0726-2ce6-1b92a4fd9712@gmail.com> <4613.1604610222@localhost> <3bfc23ab.47.1759c92d025.Webtop.219@btinternet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1599_1228265469.1604654944391"
User-Agent: OWM Mail 3
X-SID: 219
X-Originating-IP: [86.158.19.37]
From: William_J_G Overington <wjgo_10009@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 09:29:04 +0000
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iotops/am1miQoh9SAjiP42bm28D_ysOcg>
Subject: Re: [Iotops] maintain ownership
X-BeenThere: iotops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IOT Operations <iotops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iotops>, <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iotops/>
List-Post: <mailto:iotops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iotops>, <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 09:29:09 -0000
> We could define several new words, how ever many we consider > necessary, and never change the meanings once defined. An End User Licence Agreement (EULA) can cause problems. I have no experience of EULAs with Internet of Things devices, but my experiences with EULAs in relation to fonts may be of interest and have resonance with EULAs for Internet of Things devices. One of the great design features of some computer operating systems, including Windows 10, is that most applications use fonts from a central fonts folder on the computer. So when I am using the Serif PagePlus desktop publishing software to produce a PDF (Portable Document Format) document I can use any appropriately licenced font that is in the fonts folder of my home computer. So I often use Goudita SF, a rather nice Venetian-style font bundled with PagePlus, a font based upon a typeface used by Nicolas Jenson in Venice in the 1470s. There are lots of fonts out there and I would happily buy some of them, but the problem is often the EULAs. This is because I have a small webspace and I like to upload PDF documents that I produce with fonts embedded within them and make them free to read, no registration required, so I have no knowledge of how many copies, if any, are read by people accessing them on the web. The EULAs often want really high licence fees for known quantities of web accesses, and so I just cannot afford that and also I have no way of counting downloads and the net effect is that, no matter how good the design, I just do not buy or use the font because of the terms of the EULA. So, I only use fonts supplied with the software or with other software from Serif, a few generously-offered open source fonts, and some fonts that I have produced myself using the High-Logic software programs FontCreator and Scanahand. http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~ngo/ So maybe we need to have a new word, sanseulaship, from "sans (without) eula ownership". This would be pronounced with 'sans' as in sands without the 'd', eula pronounced 'yoo-la' and ship as in 'ownership, thus four syllables, san(d)s - yoo - la - ship. Example sentences: This company will only purchase sanseulaship devices. The sanseulaship policy of the manufacturer has increased the sales of its devices and their widespread deployment. A word that I coined, telesoftware, is now in the Oxford English Dictionary. The coining of new words to encapsulate new meanings is entirely acceptable and part of the way that the English language evolves and develops over time. If the word sanseulaship is to be useful and become used we need a precise definition to be produced and agreed by this group, then published and sent to some dictionaries and to some legal deposit libraries. . William Overington Friday 6 November 2020
- [Iotops] New Non-WG Mailing List: IOTOPS -- IOT O… IETF Secretariat
- Re: [Iotops] New Non-WG Mailing List: IOTOPS -- I… Andrew G. Malis
- [Iotops] can we create protocols that securely tr… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Iotops] can we create protocols that securel… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Iotops] can we create protocols that securel… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Iotops] can we create protocols that securel… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Iotops] maintain ownership (was: can we crea… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Iotops] can we create protocols that securel… William_J_G Overington
- Re: [Iotops] can we create protocols that securel… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [Iotops] can we create protocols that securel… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Iotops] can we create protocols that securel… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Iotops] can we create protocols that securel… Toerless Eckert
- [Iotops] Use of abbreviations William_J_G Overington
- Re: [Iotops] Use of abbreviations Henk Birkholz
- Re: [Iotops] Use of abbreviations William_J_G Overington
- Re: [Iotops] Use of abbreviations Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Iotops] can we create protocols that securel… Qin Wu
- Re: [Iotops] maintain ownership (was: can we crea… Qin Wu
- Re: [Iotops] maintain ownership (was: can we crea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Iotops] maintain ownership (was: can we crea… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Iotops] maintain ownership (was: can we crea… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [Iotops] maintain ownership (was: can we crea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Iotops] maintain ownership (was: can we crea… Amyas Phillips, Ambotec
- Re: [Iotops] maintain ownership (was: can we crea… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Iotops] maintain ownership Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Iotops] maintain ownership Michael Richardson
- Re: [Iotops] maintain ownership William_J_G Overington
- Re: [Iotops] maintain ownership William_J_G Overington