IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iotops] [arch-d] How old is too old and what this means for product lifecycles? Re: [Last-Call] [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-09.txt> (Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1) to Best Current Practice

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 07 December 2020 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: iotops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iotops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3F03A0FC2; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 08:49:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Cr9p_DHfdTY; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 08:49:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F5383A12E7; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 08:49:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1kmJgz-0002YG-Nu; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 16:48:53 +0000
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 08:48:52 -0800
Message-ID: <m2r1o1k1e3.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "\"Sávyo Vinícius\"" <savyovm@gmail.com>
Cc: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, iotops@ietf.org, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, architecture-discuss@iab.org, Amyas Phillips <amyas@ambotec.org>, "Ackermann, Michael" <MAckermann@bcbsm.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGJRHzD7GhgXhgz69sNHqsN=GCZR37Y3Ysa25--NRbgWyyATSA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f8486514-9726-68d0-2bc8-dccd4293017e@cs.tcd.ie> <DM6PR14MB317843CA2B3D67F6660F4F0DD7F10@DM6PR14MB3178.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <127BB8C9-679E-48C1-8617-C6092AEE9914@fugue.com> <DM6PR14MB3178C1F8B6E4FD6E9FD9C8C4D7F10@DM6PR14MB3178.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <8E6EB6FF-E83B-44B5-A0A2-7499678DC6B6@fugue.com> <DM6PR14MB317817FD62369A8E0FF93CA8D7F10@DM6PR14MB3178.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <77363965-99A5-4790-B40B-011827C8D113@fugue.com> <80F697E4-B225-49E0-8271-CDAB66E42A95@cisco.com> <m2zh2sktty.wl-randy@psg.com> <277E5229-EFCC-4758-B4F6-6B159212BA14@ambotec.org> <20201207091854.GD44833@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CACgrgBa+JMDBWWBotfQeJMc=LMbkH+JbkbQ_YkXS4GuccnbrVA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGJRHzD7GhgXhgz69sNHqsN=GCZR37Y3Ysa25--NRbgWyyATSA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iotops/hQwPVP-CJnamfbvXWS7jJOxOpzk>
Subject: Re: [Iotops] [arch-d] How old is too old and what this means for product lifecycles? Re: [Last-Call] [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-09.txt> (Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: iotops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IOT Operations <iotops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iotops>, <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iotops/>
List-Post: <mailto:iotops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iotops>, <mailto:iotops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 16:49:16 -0000

> I really believe in the efficacy of an open source-based approach, but
> there is a long way to develop a consistent framework (including community,
> regulation, best practices, and other relevant stuff) to do it.

https://xkcd.com/2347/

v2.15.0 | Report a Bug | By Email