Re: [Iotops] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-07

[Carles Gomez Montenegro <[e-mail]>]

I have already used this document in a project...

I am definitely in favor of adoption!

Cheers,

Carles



<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Libre
de virus.www.avg.com
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 04:01, Panwei (William) <william.panwei=
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Support +1
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards & Thanks!
>
> Wei Pan (潘伟)
>
>
>
> *From:* Iotops [mailto:[e-mail]] *On Behalf Of *Marco
> Tiloca
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 7, 2023 3:13 AM
> *To:* [e-mail]
> *Subject:* Re: [Iotops] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for
> draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-07
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is a useful document and I support its adoption in IOTOPS.
>
> Best,
> /Marco
>
> On 2023-03-06 12:50, Thomas Fossati wrote:
>
> I agree with Göran, this looks like a very useful document and well in
> scope for IoTOps.
>
>
>
> On 06/03/2023, 11:40, "Iotops" <[e-mail]>
> <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>
>
> I support adoption. Before these side-by-side comparison existed, there
> were lots of erroneous claims circulating about message overhead for
> security protocols. Completing this document seems like a good way to
> mitigate that discussion from reappearing.
>
>
>
> Göran
>
>
>
> *From: *Iotops <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> on
> behalf of Henk Birkholz <[e-mail]>
> <[e-mail]>
> *Date: *Wednesday, 1 March 2023 at 19:30
> *To: *IOTOPS Working Group <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
> *Subject: *[Iotops] 🔔 WG Adoption Call for
> draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-07
>
> Dear IOTOPS members,
>
> this starts a call for Working Group Adoption of
>
> >
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-07
> <https://eur05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison-07&data=05%7C01%7Cmarco.tiloca%40ri.se%7C0dc36e469ec84e6c4faa08db1e39094c%7C5a9809cf0bcb413a838a09ecc40cc9e8%7C0%7C0%7C638137002545795243%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=e6pfdrwZX%2FrlBnKbA0NyOh5Ys9tNZyMO9jdv7CQ3UTg%3D&reserved=0>
>
> ending on Wednesday, March 15th.
>
> As a reminder, this I-D describes experiences with message sizes for
> various configurations of security protocols. This can aid in selecting
> protocols for specific constrained environments.
>
> Previously, the I-D has been progressed in LWIG. There was rough in-room
> consensus at the IETF 115 meeting to make IOTOPS its new home and move
> forward with a WG adoption call, as is documented in
>
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-115-iotops-202211081300/
> <https://eur05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fminutes-115-iotops-202211081300%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cmarco.tiloca%40ri.se%7C0dc36e469ec84e6c4faa08db1e39094c%7C5a9809cf0bcb413a838a09ecc40cc9e8%7C0%7C0%7C638137002545795243%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=1NAzAEG56mb%2FuSPBkr25zPHUQTGXH090vhF%2B16BZQMk%3D&reserved=0>
>
> Please reply with your support and especially any substantive comments
> you may have.
>
>
> For the IOTOPS co-chairs,
>
> Henk
>
> --
> Iotops mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iotops
> <https://eur05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fiotops&data=05%7C01%7Cmarco.tiloca%40ri.se%7C0dc36e469ec84e6c4faa08db1e39094c%7C5a9809cf0bcb413a838a09ecc40cc9e8%7C0%7C0%7C638137002545795243%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=eIw5%2ByOoPRd7ZW5bh8KPfU0FNyfbwSF9ZPkAiMPndPQ%3D&reserved=0>
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
> information in any medium. Thank you.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Marco Tiloca
>
> Ph.D., Senior Researcher
>
>
>
> Phone: [phone]
>
>
>
> RISE Research Institutes of Sweden AB
>
> Box 1263
>
> 164 29 Kista (Sweden)
>
>
>
> Division: Digital Systems
>
> Department: Computer Science
>
> Unit: Cybersecurity
>
>
>
> https://www.ri.se
>
> --
> Iotops mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iotops
>