Re: [Iotsi] interactive vs. programmatic IoT

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:

>
> On 25 Mar 2016, at 18:31, Michael Koster <michaeljohnkoster@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I think this defines a use case for what we are doing:
>
> "Service providers have royalty-free use of shared information models that
> provide access to resources hosted in various "ecosystems", where
> ecosystems include but are not limited to: OCF, ZigBee, Bluetooth, IPSO,
> OneM2M, Z-Wave and emerging ecosystems like the "native web" thing
> ecosystem."
>
> What this means is we are not defining a new framework for people to build
> things to, rather a way forward to model common things that we can all
> share on a royalty-free basis to promote semantic interoperability across
> connected things and services.
>
> This, practically by definition, enables application logic to be decoupled
> from thing specifications.
>
>
> If everyone uses different frameworks for representing models, the
> challenge will be how to map between them. The suggestion is to use RDF as
> an interlingua as a way to avoid having to define direct mappings of terms
> between all modelling languages. This means that terms used in modelling
> languages need to be mapped to RDF URIs. We want to encourage people to use
> the same URIs for terms with the same meaning.  However, people can define
> their own URIs if appropriate.
>
> Dave

I think some of us prefer JSON-LD (at least in the higher layer models).
My understanding is
that the mapping to RDF is straightforward, but I have no experience.
What's your opinion?

Kerry

—
>    Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Iotsi mailing list
> Iotsi@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/iotsi
>
>