Re: [Iotsi] interactive vs. programmatic IoT

Michael Koster <michaeljohnkoster@gmail.com> Fri, 25 March 2016 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <michaeljohnkoster@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE0812D194 for <iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HfOmQEVMtSK0 for <iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22b.google.com (mail-pa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 639DE12D18B for <iotsi@iab.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id tt10so51329579pab.3 for <iotsi@iab.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=Sv9WiWdsWvT2tc4ZhfsrbQKHmhtOG+X9Q+A/hA4tQz8=; b=ljzjkCSU4nogEYqgzWk8GQG3UP2Mu4is/mvaTTmLLpnFxOLiq/AJlzbn6T1rCCOljo tC2cAMtKnbj4fTY+4QDH2ue3WBP+FmWO33PwDfVbGYdtd0jLoHXdftvmd1T4kPT8KSHI SJdyxI0V3vKr4cSHtwd/d93jvYOvlCu8kUVcyB2cIkLIjCd8Tc+qwaUl20rKlysoiFsP 4DOJI5Jo82YoKaxeSEZXthJHg5QskpusBgMgkEYgXpBsiyNp3yKjPXuOUbx0zYkn0lnx UoYVjVonZzWkbhiTeM2D4qphQCDt+6bbUAeWwHjTkYukBfcrUEfNb9sLxBzz5mKWN6Cz 425A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=Sv9WiWdsWvT2tc4ZhfsrbQKHmhtOG+X9Q+A/hA4tQz8=; b=G4bN1yiwwUAPqwQC0UId1JF5g/mKl1KT6pBfa+apeUVo6SGKWCPOGYl5Gx+smQLQ2S qybrC54Wv1YqR8CIOcRo0t+xzYk0hbcNd1dPtoZaSc+rdg7vvAd2qpP6TmEiGvJTIibA DE9GDUbhpdLWTeJoz/8c4QCsQeLnQ6Alv64pyTAjprC4ZXV6ZiZssktb6a4fjGs0WEnQ dPYGndEW8cc8owBA4lsUs5kHH/kMF5FX8BRM8tvq30Fpl+c/CvrgZV+i7HRsRi4aOo6m nOMMDNSCKcCV5TKvP8YXqP2109iaYP2LW7a7XtGQyJEmmG88kxuwNp3AoG1u2EbJBUIH egXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJ7aXe5mUx1YUF7kv7ps9fFs+KYWVBQiiRTAkdkEE5SUonKz6W0a2w8vZAqtH6mOw==
X-Received: by 10.66.132.73 with SMTP id os9mr23107206pab.27.1458930692974; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.21] (108-201-184-41.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.201.184.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id xn8sm17969287pab.15.2016.03.25.11.31.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_08E18DCC-ADF8-445E-BAB1-5AE745A4B1E3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Michael Koster <michaeljohnkoster@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E55FD81A-79F3-441F-B54E-B4BF4E7F122E@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:31:30 -0700
Message-Id: <9B6682C1-A625-4E10-BDB8-B12526822FAD@gmail.com>
References: <CABCOCHQpj2wMObJUUAFMAQ1xAtdw08ZRQqtaqwMWre_63RQhpQ@mail.gmail.com> <D40BA8183A12B448ACB9448546032E089C935B71@ORSMSX116.amr.corp.intel.com> <9ef1d2dac4a347c19f989d9dee5efbd9@QEO00410.de.t-online.corp> <SN1PR0201MB15344A90DBBAACA135F0E61398820@SN1PR0201MB1534.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CABCOCHRN43QZDVMYeEbLEHetfTEio-Y=MiHkAFEga9cZ59ksMA@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0201MB1534EB82A99FAC915D0876D298820@SN1PR0201MB1534.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CABCOCHTm0kGqU+MjnA4J0OK-tKmVZAPxjmy7i8cQcKax21hDkg@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0201MB1534F8F86D1ED7916176833E98820@SN1PR0201MB1534.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <2218A00E-2A48-4498-A667-A6F9DF6AA1BB@yahoo.com> <CD7461FB-FC3C-4341-8B28-467FDA444C1F@w3.org> <E29201B9-BF4A-4F4E-B335-FE97518C6523@yahoo.com> <E55FD81A-79F3-441F-B54E-B4BF4E7F122E@w3.org>
To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iotsi/R3Ze-Qd_qebFGLZSXgWCxfK9FWE>
Cc: Clarke Stevens <cstevens63@yahoo.com>, Michel Kohanim <michel@universal-devices.com>, "iotsi@iab.org" <iotsi@iab.org>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Ravi Subramaniam <ravi.subramaniam@intel.com>, "Kreuzer, Kai" <k.kreuzer@telekom.de>
Subject: Re: [Iotsi] interactive vs. programmatic IoT
X-BeenThere: iotsi@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet of Things Semantic Interoperability Workshop <iotsi.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/iotsi>, <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iotsi/>
List-Post: <mailto:iotsi@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/iotsi>, <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 18:31:35 -0000

I think this defines a use case for what we are doing: 

"Service providers have royalty-free use of shared information models that provide access to resources hosted in various "ecosystems", where ecosystems include but are not limited to: OCF, ZigBee, Bluetooth, IPSO, OneM2M, Z-Wave and emerging ecosystems like the "native web" thing ecosystem."

What this means is we are not defining a new framework for people to build things to, rather a way forward to model common things that we can all share on a royalty-free basis to promote semantic interoperability across connected things and services.

This, practically by definition, enables application logic to be decoupled from thing specifications.

Michael


> On Mar 25, 2016, at 11:11 AM, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 25 Mar 2016, at 17:39, Clarke Stevens <cstevens63@yahoo.com <mailto:cstevens63@yahoo.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>> For instance, could we agree on standard that enable search engines to index models published via the Web?  
>> 
>> I believe so.
>> 
>>> Can we encourage royalty free use of published models? 
>> 
>> Certainly. This is one thing the OCF is trying to do and is part of the agreement for liaisons where data models are intended to be shared. Some of these have been executed and others are in process.
>> 
>>> Can we decouple application logic from the complexities of the underlying platforms and protocols?
>> 
>> Yes. This is one of the goals of OCF. Admittedly, OCF defines how to do this with OCF. It would be even nicer if there were a more universally accepted way.
> 
> This is indeed what the W3C hopes to realize with the web of things as an abstraction layer that will work across a wide range of platforms and standards.  
> 
> —
>    Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Iotsi mailing list
> Iotsi@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/iotsi