Re: [Iotsi] interactive vs. programmatic IoT

David Janes <davidjanes@davidjanes.com> Mon, 28 March 2016 11:29 UTC

Return-Path: <davidjanes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEF112D88D for <iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 04:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tNKID9pKBMyb for <iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 04:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x241.google.com (mail-oi0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC53812D886 for <iotsi@iab.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 04:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x241.google.com with SMTP id q133so6496088oib.1 for <iotsi@iab.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 04:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=MUmDmZ5n9E3JFAgu3LNX7pCXlJm9RNqA7VuOBLp2lGY=; b=tz1lY+D6PJmVbv8SjiV3y7sKXgDbP6+fAj+/oxtoAyOdZcr7mGUeoUxGaqTsxuOPq0 ANvdPpiqwNCTdD5DNCNuVKfJHbH/gKYye4jFzCGkRJjDZFzyF6vyftkV25bFlrcKdeqG sNgrqJUjnCtBEAekdInLc6wFuqSiELU8wk9kbsi+u1is7jAqk7iboyQ7HvXIQTJPYFZk hijIMMhzZMruChm+tOUmGYOdejV3rPLguPyXql5fptxeBkH8gOd5zk752uE8oBpdyI0y 2kACo2V8mt2DRJ4XzOWXV8OV5YaVD9+pISPPeiFSe5C15Ez+NopRw5msBZh1TUU6EmXl mzCA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MUmDmZ5n9E3JFAgu3LNX7pCXlJm9RNqA7VuOBLp2lGY=; b=atYbkWg1voJy5R4rnBBf7HDkaxiuOmfoHIBQxYxa/TwfVwz6oRLDWu5WM9nbs+tlV8 8w3PEfMFV0RkhrlPkPA7ne7gjrYrNITfsa3GXDxrqTZDpGWijZiz6sqf4pP6MRBqM30x fzLJz65IccwjfroWP7HnqMMZaIZSzKshadnwffJQRAf8K3wSORjSKiRnU21NxjNvK0Cs EQK/7WiOWJs4/miWbj7IOfFlOGA6OQAvGFLoTZZfY9T7jfpdiES+F3P9a0umNM/++cX7 2AucQZmbNv2rwUdpyMSlk+8CUycJ6KeeG+uAjFYpjoZrJIL7HXtDtr7kQUijk4OvGVjB bEZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKICqOsgc7lisVTVGdJoTbl+Y4gI3lwCMkyHMtpysgAGqO/H+8SsS5NMbcTGNRQpfreZ+3rUaArf58udA==
X-Received: by 10.157.38.227 with SMTP id i32mr3052616otd.68.1459164564124; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 04:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: davidjanes@gmail.com
Received: by 10.182.17.101 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 04:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9B6682C1-A625-4E10-BDB8-B12526822FAD@gmail.com>
References: <CABCOCHQpj2wMObJUUAFMAQ1xAtdw08ZRQqtaqwMWre_63RQhpQ@mail.gmail.com> <D40BA8183A12B448ACB9448546032E089C935B71@ORSMSX116.amr.corp.intel.com> <9ef1d2dac4a347c19f989d9dee5efbd9@QEO00410.de.t-online.corp> <SN1PR0201MB15344A90DBBAACA135F0E61398820@SN1PR0201MB1534.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CABCOCHRN43QZDVMYeEbLEHetfTEio-Y=MiHkAFEga9cZ59ksMA@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0201MB1534EB82A99FAC915D0876D298820@SN1PR0201MB1534.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CABCOCHTm0kGqU+MjnA4J0OK-tKmVZAPxjmy7i8cQcKax21hDkg@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0201MB1534F8F86D1ED7916176833E98820@SN1PR0201MB1534.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <2218A00E-2A48-4498-A667-A6F9DF6AA1BB@yahoo.com> <CD7461FB-FC3C-4341-8B28-467FDA444C1F@w3.org> <E29201B9-BF4A-4F4E-B335-FE97518C6523@yahoo.com> <E55FD81A-79F3-441F-B54E-B4BF4E7F122E@w3.org> <9B6682C1-A625-4E10-BDB8-B12526822FAD@gmail.com>
From: David Janes <davidjanes@davidjanes.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 07:29:04 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: jPihHYfDdxrec9Yz-OpfFaJ7t3k
Message-ID: <CACp1KyMQenxRpij1HPbs2TrS7OpsGbe=E+N8CQh6QWNJBuBGFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Koster <michaeljohnkoster@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113e4a0c83792a052f1a39f6"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iotsi/ZH-4WBDigAreN0mdtkMZsocaFs8>
Cc: Clarke Stevens <cstevens63@yahoo.com>, Michel Kohanim <michel@universal-devices.com>, "Kreuzer, Kai" <k.kreuzer@telekom.de>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Ravi Subramaniam <ravi.subramaniam@intel.com>, "iotsi@iab.org" <iotsi@iab.org>, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [Iotsi] interactive vs. programmatic IoT
X-BeenThere: iotsi@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet of Things Semantic Interoperability Workshop <iotsi.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/iotsi>, <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iotsi/>
List-Post: <mailto:iotsi@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/iotsi>, <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 11:29:27 -0000

+1!

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Michael Koster <michaeljohnkoster@gmail.com
> wrote:

> I think this defines a use case for what we are doing:
>
> "Service providers have royalty-free use of shared information models that
> provide access to resources hosted in various "ecosystems", where
> ecosystems include but are not limited to: OCF, ZigBee, Bluetooth, IPSO,
> OneM2M, Z-Wave and emerging ecosystems like the "native web" thing
> ecosystem."
>
> What this means is we are not defining a new framework for people to build
> things to, rather a way forward to model common things that we can all
> share on a royalty-free basis to promote semantic interoperability across
> connected things and services.
>
> This, practically by definition, enables application logic to be decoupled
> from thing specifications.
>
> Michael
>
>
> On Mar 25, 2016, at 11:11 AM, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 25 Mar 2016, at 17:39, Clarke Stevens <cstevens63@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> For instance, could we agree on standard that enable search engines to
> index models published via the Web?
>
>
> I believe so.
>
> Can we encourage royalty free use of published models?
>
>
> Certainly. This is one thing the OCF is trying to do and is part of the
> agreement for liaisons where data models are intended to be shared. Some of
> these have been executed and others are in process.
>
> Can we decouple application logic from the complexities of the underlying
> platforms and protocols?
>
>
> Yes. This is one of the goals of OCF. Admittedly, OCF defines how to do
> this with OCF. It would be even nicer if there were a more universally
> accepted way.
>
>
> This is indeed what the W3C hopes to realize with the web of things as an
> abstraction layer that will work across a wide range of platforms and
> standards.
>
> —
>    Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Iotsi mailing list
> Iotsi@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/iotsi
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Iotsi mailing list
> Iotsi@iab.org
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/iotsi
>
>