Re: [Iotsi] interactive vs. programmatic IoT

Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> Tue, 29 March 2016 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dsr@w3.org>
X-Original-To: iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B232712D571 for <iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54hBwDAitalL for <iotsi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lewis.sophia.w3.org (lewis.sophia.w3.org [193.51.208.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F3B512D83E for <iotsi@iab.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host86-145-168-64.range86-145.btcentralplus.com ([86.145.168.64] helo=daves-mbp.home) by lewis.sophia.w3.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <dsr@w3.org>) id 1akugn-00050w-T4; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:32:14 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_27A4A6DF-208A-4167-AE1B-3035E81B954E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABOxzu2hg8UoafgJrLTu=bqfB-dkmKA-q9mT7OGF93ac4UJogA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:32:13 +0100
Message-Id: <BFEB5D64-9291-4C1F-8BED-5DBFA686D0F4@w3.org>
References: <CABCOCHQpj2wMObJUUAFMAQ1xAtdw08ZRQqtaqwMWre_63RQhpQ@mail.gmail.com> <D40BA8183A12B448ACB9448546032E089C935B71@ORSMSX116.amr.corp.intel.com> <9ef1d2dac4a347c19f989d9dee5efbd9@QEO00410.de.t-online.corp> <SN1PR0201MB15344A90DBBAACA135F0E61398820@SN1PR0201MB1534.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CABCOCHRN43QZDVMYeEbLEHetfTEio-Y=MiHkAFEga9cZ59ksMA@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0201MB1534EB82A99FAC915D0876D298820@SN1PR0201MB1534.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CABCOCHTm0kGqU+MjnA4J0OK-tKmVZAPxjmy7i8cQcKax21hDkg@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0201MB1534F8F86D1ED7916176833E98820@SN1PR0201MB1534.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <2218A00E-2A48-4498-A667-A6F9DF6AA1BB@yahoo.com> <CD7461FB-FC3C-4341-8B28-467FDA444C1F@w3.org> <E29201B9-BF4A-4F4E-B335-FE97518C6523@yahoo.com> <E55FD81A-79F3-441F-B54E-B4BF4E7F122E@w3.org> <9B6682C1-A625-4E10-BDB8-B12526822FAD@gmail.com> <3DDFAD56-CE02-4BC3-9938-40DA4E7CDA39@w3.org> <CABOxzu2hg8UoafgJrLTu=bqfB-dkmKA-q9mT7OGF93ac4UJogA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iotsi/jczFO_cMHEdR4b4LoJgWDbCim2s>
Cc: Clarke Stevens <cstevens63@yahoo.com>, Michel Kohanim <michel@universal-devices.com>, "Kreuzer, Kai" <k.kreuzer@telekom.de>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Ravi Subramaniam <ravi.subramaniam@intel.com>, "iotsi@iab.org" <iotsi@iab.org>, Michael Koster <michaeljohnkoster@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Iotsi] interactive vs. programmatic IoT
X-BeenThere: iotsi@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet of Things Semantic Interoperability Workshop <iotsi.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/iotsi>, <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iotsi/>
List-Post: <mailto:iotsi@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/iotsi>, <mailto:iotsi-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:32:41 -0000

JSON-LD allows web developers to use short names that are bound to RDF URIs in linked context definitions.  

> On 29 Mar 2016, at 13:45, Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>> wrote:
> 
>> On 25 Mar 2016, at 18:31, Michael Koster <michaeljohnkoster@gmail.com <mailto:michaeljohnkoster@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> I think this defines a use case for what we are doing: 
>> 
>> "Service providers have royalty-free use of shared information models that provide access to resources hosted in various "ecosystems", where ecosystems include but are not limited to: OCF, ZigBee, Bluetooth, IPSO, OneM2M, Z-Wave and emerging ecosystems like the "native web" thing ecosystem."
>> 
>> What this means is we are not defining a new framework for people to build things to, rather a way forward to model common things that we can all share on a royalty-free basis to promote semantic interoperability across connected things and services.
>> 
>> This, practically by definition, enables application logic to be decoupled from thing specifications.
> 
> If everyone uses different frameworks for representing models, the challenge will be how to map between them. The suggestion is to use RDF as an interlingua as a way to avoid having to define direct mappings of terms between all modelling languages. This means that terms used in modelling languages need to be mapped to RDF URIs. We want to encourage people to use the same URIs for terms with the same meaning.  However, people can define their own URIs if appropriate.
> 
> Dave
> 
> I think some of us prefer JSON-LD (at least in the higher layer models).  My understanding is
> that the mapping to RDF is straightforward, but I have no experience.  What's your opinion?
> 
> Kerry
> 
> —
>    Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Iotsi mailing list
> Iotsi@iab.org <mailto:Iotsi@iab.org>
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/iotsi <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/iotsi>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Iotsi mailing list
> Iotsi@iab.org <mailto:Iotsi@iab.org>
> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/iotsi <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/iotsi>
—
   Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org <mailto:dsr@w3.org>>