Re: SIP now IPv6

Frank Kastenholz <kasten@ftp.com> Mon, 28 December 1992 15:38 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14331; 28 Dec 92 10:38 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14327; 28 Dec 92 10:38 EST
Received: from Sun.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05775; 28 Dec 92 10:41 EST
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (zigzag-bb.Corp.Sun.COM) by Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA06531; Mon, 28 Dec 92 07:40:51 PST
Received: from sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA09635; Mon, 28 Dec 92 07:40:49 PST
Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (engmail1) by sunroof.Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA01533; Mon, 28 Dec 92 07:40:39 PST
Received: from Sun.COM (sun-barr) by Eng.Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA17651; Mon, 28 Dec 92 07:40:42 PST
Received: from ftp.com (babyoil.ftp.com) by Sun.COM (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA06521; Mon, 28 Dec 92 07:40:37 PST
Received: by ftp.com id AA22932; Mon, 28 Dec 92 10:40:40 -0500
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 10:40:40 -0500
Message-Id: <9212281540.AA22932@ftp.com>
To: dcrocker@mordor.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: SIP now IPv6
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Frank Kastenholz <kasten@ftp.com>
Reply-To: kasten@ftp.com
Cc: hwb@upeksa.sdsc.edu, sip@caldera.usc.edu, ip-encaps@sunroof.eng.sun.com, iana@isi.edu, iab@isi.edu
Content-Length: 1274

could you children take this someplace else? some of us are trying to
do real work and do not relish the though of reading through this garbage.

 >     Besides that, I agree with Dave Crocker in that SIPers/IPAEers are
 >     politizising by getting a formal number assignment out of a sparse
 >     space earlyon. And trying to win PR battles with immediate announcements,
 >     as was just demonstrated yesterday.
 > 
 > Hans-Werner, when you issued your heated message to the IAB, yesterday,
 > that was bad enough.  You now are including a wider audience.  This
 > is the second major effort on your part to attack our effort, of which
 > I am aware.  It is based on silly and inapprpriate misinterpretation.
 > Please stop or at least take it off-line.
 > 
 > I don't know why you feel inclined toward such attacks and don't know why
 > you feel inclined towards interpreting events with such distortion.  Last
 > time, your attack was based on your failure even to read summaries of
 > our work, much less review of the specification.  This time, you are
 > turning a simple administrative event into something evil.
 > 
 > Perhaps you haven't noticed today's date.  You might consider taking
 > its intended spirit to heart.
 > 
 > Dave
 > 


--
Frank Kastenholz