RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5458 (1746)
<H.Cruickshank@surrey.ac.uk> Tue, 07 April 2009 16:22 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipdvb-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipdvb-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DCBD3A695D for <ietfarch-ipdvb-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_STOP=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L27D4T6e6JgB for <ietfarch-ipdvb-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from erg.abdn.ac.uk (dee.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:241:204:203:baff:fe9a:8c9b]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267983A6A11 for <ipdvb-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 09:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dee.erg.abdn.ac.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by erg.abdn.ac.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n37Fli2a026942 for <ipdvb-subscribed-users@dee.erg.abdn.ac.uk>; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:47:44 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from majordomo.lists@localhost) by dee.erg.abdn.ac.uk (8.13.4/8.12.2/Submit) id n37Fliup026941 for ipdvb-subscribed-users; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:47:44 +0100 (BST)
X-Authentication-Warning: dee.erg.abdn.ac.uk: majordomo.lists set sender to owner-ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk using -f
Received: from mail80.messagelabs.com (mail80.messagelabs.com [195.245.230.163]) by erg.abdn.ac.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id n37FlA3w026920; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:47:10 +0100 (BST)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: H.Cruickshank@surrey.ac.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-80.messagelabs.com!1239119217!36089887!2
X-StarScan-Version: 6.0.0; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [131.227.102.140]
Received: (qmail 23196 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2009 15:47:01 -0000
Received: from ads40.surrey.ac.uk (HELO ads40.surrey.ac.uk) (131.227.102.140) by server-4.tower-80.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2009 15:47:01 -0000
Received: from EVS-EC1-NODE1.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.102.144]) by ads40.surrey.ac.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:46:58 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5458 (1746)
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:46:56 +0100
Message-ID: <225B6337E699484095DA8EE02A5063B57983F1@EVS-EC1-NODE1.surrey.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <200903300724.n2U7Ocpx010767@boreas.isi.edu>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5458 (1746)
Thread-Index: AcmxCOTcbn57NhQsT3KO8DtrWRjFaAGjoojg
From: H.Cruickshank@surrey.ac.uk
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, p.pillai@Bradford.ac.uk, mnoist@cosy.sbg.ac.at, sunil.iyengar@logica.com, rdroms@cisco.com, jari.arkko@piuha.net, townsley@cisco.com, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de, ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2009 15:46:58.0289 (UTC) FILETIME=[15A61E10:01C9B798]
X-ERG-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by erg.abdn.ac.uk id n37FlhFK026936
Sender: owner-ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
X-ERG-MailScanner-From: owner-ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Hi again, I suggest to add the the TS Logical Channel definition (taken from RFC 4326). So here is the proposed text: ********************************************* TS Logical Channel: Transport Stream Logical Channel. In this document, this term identifies a channel at the MPEG-2 level [ISO-MPEG2]. It exists at level 2 of the ISO/OSI reference model. All packets sent over a TS Logical Channel carry the same PID value (this value is unique within a specific TS Multiplex). The term "Stream" is defined in MPEG-2 [ISO-MPEG2] to describe the content carried by a specific TS Logical Channel (see ULE Stream). Some PID values are reserved (by MPEG-2) for specific signalling. Other standards (e.g., ATSC, DVB) also reserve specific PID values. ********************************************** ---- Dr. Haitham S. Cruickshank Lecturer Communications Centre for Communication Systems Research (CCSR) BA Building, Room E11 School of Electronics, Computing and Mathematics University of Surrey, Guildford, UK, GU2 7XH Tel: +44 1483 686007 (indirect 689844) Fax: +44 1483 686011 e-mail: H.Cruickshank@surrey.ac.uk http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/H.Cruickshank/ -----Original Message----- From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] Sent: 30 March 2009 08:25 To: Cruickshank HS Dr (CCSR); p.pillai@bradford.ac.uk; mnoist@cosy.sbg.ac.at; sunil.iyengar@logica.com; rdroms@cisco.com; jari.arkko@piuha.net; townsley@cisco.com; gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk Cc: ah@TR-Sys.de; ipdvb@erg.abdn.ac.uk; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5458 (1746) The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5458, "Security Requirements for the Unidirectional Lightweight Encapsulation (ULE) Protocol". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5458&eid=1746 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de> Section: 2 Original Text ------------- [[ at the bottom of page 5 / top of page 6 ]] TS: Transport Stream [ISO-MPEG2]. A method of transmission at the MPEG-2 layer using TS Packets; it represents Layer 2 of the ISO/OSI reference model. See also TS Logical Channel and TS Multiplex. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ << page break >> TS Multiplex: In this document, ... Corrected Text -------------- TS: Transport Stream [ISO-MPEG2]. A method of transmission at the MPEG-2 layer using TS Packets; it represents Layer 2 of the ISO/OSI reference model. See also TS Logical Channel and TS Multiplex. | | TS Logical Channel: ... << to be filled in >> | ... TS Multiplex: In this document, ... Notes ----- The quoted keyword explanation for "TS Logical Channel" is missing in Section 2. Authors/Verifiers: Please restore the entry and fill in the missing Corrected Text. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5458 (draft-ietf-ipdvb-sec-req-09) -------------------------------------- Title : Security Requirements for the Unidirectional Lightweight Encapsulation (ULE) Protocol Publication Date : March 2009 Author(s) : H. Cruickshank, P. Pillai, M. Noisternig, S. Iyengar Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : IP over DVB Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5458 (1746) H.Cruickshank
- RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5458 (1746) Allison, Art
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5458 (1746) Gorry Fairhurst
- RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5458 (1746) Allison, Art
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5458 (1746) Gorry Fairhurst
- RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5458 (1746) H.Cruickshank
- RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5458 (1746) Allison, Art
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5458 (1746) Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5458 (1746) Marie-Jose Montpetit