IETF Logo Mail Archive

[IPFIX] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02

顾 戎 <gurong_cmcc@outlook.com> Mon, 13 February 2017 05:16 UTC

Return-Path: <gurong_cmcc@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50A512947C; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:16:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CplEzs8iuJTl; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:16:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SNT004-OMC4S13.hotmail.com (snt004-omc4s13.hotmail.com [65.55.90.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A25891204D9; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:15:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.90.201]) by SNT004-OMC4S13.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:15:57 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=LSxQV+i+VJhXoi43kQeNMVQ6033UQ7R536aWM9+72D8=; b=s71xQ3HUvTabTk/k4Zxhyc8kNEdU2T3hTWUz3By9hpYZO5QRByns212hE3VPFZt58AKCY84I+NcqyDVIEkLz2gMglP/Y2/qSYPwIQis/InqqkViiOXQVGqNcIKX+c5+vLlHp9/Arcq93reLTxBIcOPbL6kGHBBmaWity57Dovm5Vdz5SqKMnCbYID2syBsO/vSpcGSkqj+zGY6RVB6gn7slKYyBlj/weiVSbUzpysmqmOrZiMhwRnnF3MhCNzYANTJ7RGG5E9mTFz7q4/GxS6mY8OaP0XM/a1b4FBHUkYwbVXWDilMWAMlDllcE6X3Iq5MpHy1skGeA00LO54v93HQ==
Received: from HK2APC01FT007.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.248.52) by HK2APC01HT168.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.249.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.874.2; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:15:54 +0000
Received: from HKNPR02MB1843.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.152.248.54) by HK2APC01FT007.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.248.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.874.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:15:54 +0000
Received: from HKNPR02MB1843.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::55cc:8e34:53c7:e065]) by HKNPR02MB1843.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::55cc:8e34:53c7:e065%14]) with mapi id 15.01.0888.030; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:15:54 +0000
From: 顾 戎 <gurong_cmcc@outlook.com>
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, "IPFIX@ietf.org" <IPFIX@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
Thread-Index: AdKFqjl1xBXNvf7XRCiwopLruYITLAAAEJpwAANatM4=
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:15:54 +0000
Message-ID: <HKNPR02MB1843C24EA99FEEE8D95015AF8B590@HKNPR02MB1843.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21A22B8B2B@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21A22B8B2B@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=outlook.com;
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:6F6457D120566377CC1BBB099ECF8E8A85F566D6AF703A9B7C3D8B721DDC827B; UpperCasedChecksum:CA54324D6455C5831EDE89B05FFC36E03881442AFD492DC513E1D3F63250DAB7; SizeAsReceived:8036; Count:39
x-tmn: [8Pglmbr3zmy94/Rgk4fus0K0DA1IfHrBkvZtXywsu/M=]
x-incomingheadercount: 39
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HK2APC01HT168; 5:a1P79EytujiS8H5A8AgKmYeWDjG52mFjm2rfb8SfpoX6obVTiu3aQCIVv1EzclbFhD0vXTDcF5zL8KBcnVjmUsMwtEjZh6LTYHzEGqty57ysA/9MvTfqU5s0myfwbvy9k4yghA4CoUFYcRpkOR8H3g==; 24:m58H+acVcUWUoNJ2cXMnKuUDWcAdb7CR4ZcI356RUIF5iXgcNOG6zm+mJ/5aY3DRj+n8lu1jAuY9NXrLNPXvokkbsno04i7+7XfaBw/IKQM=; 7: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
x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:HK2APC01HT168; H:HKNPR02MB1843.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a16193f5-ca3f-4c3a-f1dc-08d453cf62b2
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(5061506426)(5061507331)(1603103135)(1601125107)(1603101373)(1701031045); SRVR:HK2APC01HT168;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015086)(82015046); SRVR:HK2APC01HT168; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:HK2APC01HT168;
x-forefront-prvs: 02176E2458
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_HKNPR02MB1843C24EA99FEEE8D95015AF8B590HKNPR02MB1843apcp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Feb 2017 05:15:54.2870 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HK2APC01HT168
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Feb 2017 05:15:57.0019 (UTC) FILETIME=[41B78AB0:01D285B8]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/-C5Opr_OqiIgN1gVuixyqxgCCaU>
Cc: "draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.authors@ietf.org" <draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.authors@ietf.org>
Subject: [IPFIX] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:16:06 -0000

Hi, dear all. As a co-author, I support the adoption of this draft as a work group document. Here three information elements including bgpCommunity, bgpSourceCommunityList and bgpDestinationCommunityList are introduced in order to carry BGP community information. We do think it's a necessary and useful extension.


Best regards.
Gu Rong
gurong_cmcc@outlook.com
gurong@chinamobile.com
________________________________
发件人: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
发送时间: 2017年2月13日 3:49
收件人: IPFIX@ietf.org
抄送: draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.authors@ietf.org
主题: FW: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02

Dear IPFIX,

Since the IPFIX WG is concluded, this IE extension draft is processed now in OPSAWG.
Thanks very much for the previous comments and discussions on this draft in this mailing list.
Now the OPSAWG is polling for adoption of this I-D. I sincerely appreciate your opinion and review.

Best Regards,
Tianran Zhou

-----Original Message-----
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:37 AM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02

Dear OPSAWG,

In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this IPFIX IE extension draft.
By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.

Export BGP community information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02

The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by Feb 27. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement or deploy the extension described in the document.

Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IETF97 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation of course).

Regards,
Tianran

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email