[IPFIX] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5470 (7364)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 23 February 2023 03:43 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E24C14EB1A for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 19:43:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.648
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S_k7-ZZnCygX for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 19:43:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org []) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E1BEC14CE28 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 19:43:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 218EE4C1A7; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 19:43:10 -0800 (PST)
To: gsadasiv@rohati.com, n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz, bclaise@cisco.com, quittek@nw.neclab.eu, warren@kumari.net, rwilton@cisco.com, n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz, quittek@neclab.eu
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: naykyawthu199@gmail.com, ipfix@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230223034310.218EE4C1A7@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 19:43:10 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/-RAPhz1jGh26GHSp4nBVSUr2DLI>
Subject: [IPFIX] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5470 (7364)
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 03:43:15 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5470,
"Architecture for IP Flow Information Export".

You may review the report below and at:

Type: Technical
Reported by: Nay Kyaw Thu <naykyawthu199@gmail.com>

Section: 22

Original Text

Corrected Text


This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

RFC5470 (draft-ietf-ipfix-architecture-12)
Title               : Architecture for IP Flow Information Export
Publication Date    : March 2009
Author(s)           : G. Sadasivan, N. Brownlee, B. Claise, J. Quittek
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : IP Flow Information Export
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG