Re: [IPFIX] errata filed http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5655.txt

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 21 April 2015 10:03 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A1E1A8AE4 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 03:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iAn6Ta9RqImt for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 03:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35E181A8AD4 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 03:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4284; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429610517; x=1430820117; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to; bh=UXBRON8Sik1Oumn+ldJgAQ0j1ZtnjL86bW/BvQYmg9c=; b=hQfDYc7rO6ebu/4oYB3Vo1sl1R7W51GwOHOQsDUd0l5V1rvMLk50TIxT sIUCVfj+r6iWGKiNXvEVRGQDPzA26P8zQ1AgkizAT5ng/+i35JH7EwQiD FyKC3Ad4YHKHTIag0v1fKm29qRSsUTo8Pp21DGyJwaDw8mIoK5Wq4UJ91 M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D9AwAGHzZV/xbLJq1BGoNeXMYUCYFFAQmGBAKBeRQBAQEBAQEBfYQhAQEEAQEBawoRCwQdFg8JAwIBAgEVMAYBDAYCAQGIJw03yVQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXizeFC4QtAQSbV4cpjX8iggIDGQSBUzwxARGCMgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,615,1422921600"; d="scan'208,217";a="437142865"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Apr 2015 10:01:55 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3LA1sQ9027460; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:01:55 GMT
Message-ID: <55362044.1000101@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:02:44 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, IPFIX Working Group <ipfix@ietf.org>
References: <5533F654.20103@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <5533F654.20103@bogus.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020202010004090805070107"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/71be4_sCBb_EMtZ9YvMd6YQMn04>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] errata filed http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5655.txt
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 10:03:30 -0000

Joel, Dear all,

I discussed this errata with the RFC editor a few weeks ago.
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=2030, which was similar, 
has been updated with s/317/285/
Next, I'll reject this errata below.

Regards, Benoit
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/verify_errata_select.php?eid=4308
>
> what say you?
>
>
> Status: Reported
> Type: Editorial
>
> Reported By: Paul Aitken
> Date Reported: 2015-03-19
> Section A.5 says:
>
> A.5.  Complete File Example
>
>     Bringing together the examples above and adding message headers as
>     appropriate, a hex dump of the first 317 bytes of the example File
>     constructed above would appear as in the annotated Figure 10 below.
> It should say:
>
> A.5.  Complete File Example
>
>     Bringing together the examples above and adding message headers as
>     appropriate, a hex dump of the first 285 bytes of the example File
>     constructed above would appear as in the annotated Figure 10 below.
> Notes:
>
> s/317/285/
>
> Figure 10 shows 18 lines of 16 octets each, less three octets in the
> final row.
> (18 x 16 - 3) = 285 octets.
>
> This can also be confirmed by the revised numbering in errata 2030 -
> though note that the dump is numbered from octet zero:
>
> 272: 80 02 00 50 06 00 00 46 50 00 00 00 41
>
> Since the offset of the final octet ("41") is 284, the overall length
> must be 285.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPFIX mailing list
> IPFIX@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix