Re: [IPFIX] review of draft-ietf-ipfix-a9n-04

Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com> Fri, 02 November 2012 11:18 UTC

Return-Path: <paitken@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C8C21F8B88 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 04:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.082, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7n8Bb1HuN0Fs for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 04:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-4.cisco.com (ams-iport-4.cisco.com [144.254.224.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864FD21F8B83 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 04:18:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=373; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1351855103; x=1353064703; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oBY6zKkROTFzrXWwkGwUEgbAYSsGWpSgKC5pXUL7Sn0=; b=ITEhF9vb4EO58JGuLQ+2pU3XZUbCjLVH1rr8fvr+o756McqMeNcKBXJN K9uB6kg0iX8KNatjpoc3WIw/mpC+1RFjZJK8Wc2qN79eeCKMchNZtcJ6k 86F+7Yjn5Ue5I90OixF2TOTkg51xisQM1//nrKtXy36EqCQSUecwRG7Bk I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah0FAGGrk1CQ/khR/2dsb2JhbABEgyzADIEIgh4BAQEDARIBJUABEAshFg8JAwIBAgFFBg0BBwEBHodiBpttoAuSPAOVeYVriG6Ba4JvgWQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,699,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="9299475"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.72.81]) by ams-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2012 11:18:19 +0000
Received: from [10.61.102.64] (dhcp-10-61-102-64.cisco.com [10.61.102.64]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA2BIJgf032761; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:18:19 GMT
Message-ID: <5093ABFC.6070103@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:18:20 +0000
From: Paul Aitken <paitken@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian Trammell <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
References: <500039DE.5050706@cisco.com> <071B9C0F-B58F-489A-99E1-A3A4A4D25382@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <5092E68B.8070902@cisco.com> <2FE57FE3-6F59-46B8-9AB5-CE2E64807D92@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <50939C80.5020708@cisco.com> <81148FC1-091C-42ED-8D4E-4AA4A30FFE36@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
In-Reply-To: <81148FC1-091C-42ED-8D4E-4AA4A30FFE36@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: draft-ietf-ipfix-a9n@tools.ietf.org, IETF IPFIX Working Group <ipfix@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] review of draft-ietf-ipfix-a9n-04
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:18:24 -0000

>>> I wondered this myself, and I suspect you can't find the LC announcement for this document because you may not be searching far enough in the past.
>> Not so. I searched both my email and the IPFIX WG archive back to -a9n-00 on October 31st 2011.
> Hm, indeed, the draft is called "Aggregation" in the subject of the WGLC message...

Thanks, I see it now.

P.