IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPFIX] [GROW] [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Thu, 16 February 2017 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FC2129D94; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:14:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uHC6zxXm6eW8; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:14:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x243.google.com (mail-wr0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 338E2129D91; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:14:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x243.google.com with SMTP id i10so2633594wrb.0; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:14:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=+bWWxAH+qosXgSd71fhV11pgpsEcCpBhxx9/LUqv+JE=; b=UXFa2x/rrGZwyuuwZokHUAZBc564a1eAOXlM7PctNFlsDgz+1s5dLGIPyoC6VuF6UZ E1NoYimc2XqeCy1ba4/IYo3rGBNjh3ql34sEsZMhikYmOohD2ZVaeUBxs8w4YK6T/NuP ZTu+wuOc8N13U976rLBzGo1R2SGFnm++wI2yYHHzFwPDcufWjhzvqyLae4to3YI6Dwav huYKM3c4Vy0YQywVRvEVYxXDPCOKX2f1Sc9QB7uP4wvyV67exIOgnTkJbAewPZmqbPW8 2TRILRBu+NsRlOLMCBu7VKAuY1aL057Bi9rTj7voomZR/qxdxtVa3wbDpwyj73/4yTfJ 6FiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=+bWWxAH+qosXgSd71fhV11pgpsEcCpBhxx9/LUqv+JE=; b=djjPapzI4BqC7mbkfbT3rECExTq5GkSmol7izsNusdqcsEM6ulEIej1PYPgNQhrppr w3+/LE4GbfmDtqQaCkOgjAdAZs9Muf+Xu+XRC2+JWPBJ5eyN+I7R4HWJ9QgWWLh5zw7E zHIuval6uTMRl4J1cZb3calJGIa0d+KpPSPySnUcok+j3IBkB3RSLuN1S812p9s0t1BX 0EIR+KCRAlkg+DjxcYcEvt5wMRWQyTPPhCPopxni5F3o+6xJnXdEq5UpRL4/rL5Uhj/u rDVnz+luq19GUY7zIUWPC4/HpTsDdYTnuZmJro6Xb1Sej/3i2rDtOJFS6UvvkExbDB4m JB0g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39m8XYTYrOJOOM30htHSuAV02d08rzHRwBl1dnJ6vcKNXbCOSPG3Jk6uHGvJyWlOkw==
X-Received: by 10.223.139.213 with SMTP id w21mr3086012wra.108.1487261663740; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:14:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q16sm9478229wra.69.2017.02.16.08.14.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:14:23 -0800 (PST)
To: PJ Aitken <pjaitken@brocade.com>, "lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com" <lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com>, grow-bounces <grow-bounces@ietf.org>, zhoutianran <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
References: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21A22B8B05@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <7023a95c-c6a9-4d6a-b009-8f35e447aa4e@gmail.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9279357F4EA@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <2017021611151726192539@chinamobile.com> <9f060f89-a2a8-5f87-4d66-088cb389ac14@brocade.com>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <92fe27fc-f26b-ce1a-44c3-c16a33f9ad01@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:14:20 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9f060f89-a2a8-5f87-4d66-088cb389ac14@brocade.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------C9938F43EEFC00B6FCF389FE"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/MkCWHOn-2P5c3t4N9Qrajx609jI>
Cc: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>, opsawg-chairs <opsawg-chairs@ietf.org>, grow <grow@ietf.org>, "ipfix@ietf.org" <ipfix@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] [GROW] [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:14:27 -0000


On 16/02/2017 11:15, PJ Aitken wrote:
>
> IPFIX Collectors might reasonably assume that information in 
> subsequent messages supersedes information in earlier messages, so 
> splitting a list across multiple messages would not have the desired 
> effect.
>
>

Hi Paul

Could you not have multiple discrete templates?

Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email