IETF Logo Mail Archive

[IPFIX] comments on draft-johnson-ipfix-mib-variable-export-01

Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org> Tue, 31 May 2011 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <inacio@cert.org>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7569E070E for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hKfUg9a9Ipsi for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shetland.sei.cmu.edu (shetland.sei.cmu.edu [192.58.107.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8FDE06C1 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2011 07:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pawpaw.sei.cmu.edu (pawpaw.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.22]) by shetland.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4/1294) with ESMTP id p4VEqIqp004180 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:52:18 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cert.org; s=jthatj15xw2j; t=1306853538; bh=qp3Uk1KcFlCtW0DzZaKkKIbUCLKBvaxxjkzz+a1kLUM=; h=From:To:CC:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Sender:Reply-To:In-Reply-To:References; b=AuwtBfpvWIufGLpL1utgyFdjd1WNmJjDjVpfrPsxUCsH6cnZwdBVe+EsE7R3PT/h2 GujLQe364Gk//6os/lqdOsasgJxQEhE30DpPPS7J91dfrJEVcS78AVo9jKcx8SHALT P+a7CpYCqBIJq+c45me4mxLKC0VTPLmet80gV3+k=
Received: from owa.sei.cmu.edu (vader.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.14]) by pawpaw.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4/1348) with ESMTP id p4VEqIB1000713 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:52:18 -0400
Received: from EXCHANGE.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.13]) by vader.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.14]) with mapi; Tue, 31 May 2011 10:52:18 -0400
From: Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org>
To: IPFIX Working Group <ipfix@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:52:19 -0400
Thread-Topic: comments on draft-johnson-ipfix-mib-variable-export-01
Thread-Index: AcwfolYPPBnd1r72RaqYbokfkj9/vw==
Message-ID: <29883E73-D176-41BC-933C-13A89C77AE7B@cert.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_29883E73D17641BC933C13A89C77AE7Bcertorg_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [IPFIX] comments on draft-johnson-ipfix-mib-variable-export-01
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 14:52:31 -0000

Here are my comments on the draft.  This model is much improved and with some minor additional clarification I think it should be much more seriously considered.  I did everything as PDF comments to the PDF version of the draft.  I've attached it here.

regards,
chris

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email