IETF Logo Mail Archive

[IPFIX] FW: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Mon, 13 February 2017 03:48 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DFA129513; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 19:48:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ARRKfb8ClTSX; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 19:48:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5331D1293F0; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 19:48:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DGJ13073; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 03:48:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 03:48:49 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:48:44 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: "IPFIX@ietf.org" <IPFIX@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
Thread-Index: AdKFqjl1xBXNvf7XRCiwopLruYITLAAAEJpw
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 03:49:47 +0000
Message-ID: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21A22B8B2B@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.156.116]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.58A12CA3.01A3, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 33fb402d6dc0fc4450fa91eef5291391
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/NuMLPwttDZAYKm3WILI825-tyFI>
Cc: "draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.authors@ietf.org" <draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.authors@ietf.org>
Subject: [IPFIX] FW: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 03:48:55 -0000

Dear IPFIX,

Since the IPFIX WG is concluded, this IE extension draft is processed now in OPSAWG.
Thanks very much for the previous comments and discussions on this draft in this mailing list.
Now the OPSAWG is polling for adoption of this I-D. I sincerely appreciate your opinion and review.

Best Regards,
Tianran Zhou

-----Original Message-----
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:37 AM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02

Dear OPSAWG,

In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this IPFIX IE extension draft.
By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.

Export BGP community information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02

The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by Feb 27. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement or deploy the extension described in the document.

Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IETF97 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation of course).

Regards,
Tianran

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email