Re: [IPFIX] comments on draft-johnson-ipfix-mib-variable-export-01

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Wed, 01 June 2011 08:38 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455D0E07C1 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.317
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.317 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.281, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QfE4PW71B2RO for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CF0E0782 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgYBAF/45U3GmAcF/2dsb2JhbABTglKUfY5Td6scApsghiAElTWKSA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.65,302,1304308800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="282602921"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2011 04:38:55 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.65,302,1304308800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="628276977"
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.11]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2011 04:38:55 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CC2037.574DA2F1"
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:38:53 +0200
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04032BD040@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <29883E73-D176-41BC-933C-13A89C77AE7B@cert.org>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [IPFIX] comments on draft-johnson-ipfix-mib-variable-export-01
Thread-Index: AcwfolYPPBnd1r72RaqYbokfkj9/vwAk6p6Q
References: <29883E73-D176-41BC-933C-13A89C77AE7B@cert.org>
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org>, IPFIX Working Group <ipfix@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] comments on draft-johnson-ipfix-mib-variable-export-01
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 08:38:57 -0000

 

 

Hi,

Can we please avoid using PDF for comments on the mail list? While using
PDF may be justified in some cases in order to better represent complex
diagrams in RFCs or Internet-Drafts (although even for RFCs and
Internet-Drafts the default format is ASCII text, and PDF or Post-Script
are accepted only if an equivalent ASCII version is also available), I
see no reason to require proprietary sofware in order to be able to read
comments or other mails on an IETF list. 


Thanks and Regards,

Dan

From: ipfix-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipfix-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Chris Inacio
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 5:52 PM
To: IPFIX Working Group
Subject: [IPFIX] comments on draft-johnson-ipfix-mib-variable-export-01

 

Here are my comments on the draft.  This model is much improved and with
some minor additional clarification I think it should be much more
seriously considered.  I did everything as PDF comments to the PDF
version of the draft.  I've attached it here.

regards,
chris