[IPFIX] [Errata Verified] RFC6728 (4909)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 18 January 2017 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19E3129585; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 23:46:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GgvQ0HtlHekr; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 23:46:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ED5C129622; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 23:46:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 672F7B8005A; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 23:46:27 -0800 (PST)
To: vican.pavol@gmail.com, muenz@net.in.tum.de, bclaise@cisco.com, paitken@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20170118074627.672F7B8005A@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 23:46:27 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/RDLaamgi2jO3cFhnuE9-N6Nn9Ak>
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, ipfix@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [IPFIX] [Errata Verified] RFC6728 (4909)
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 07:46:30 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC6728,
"Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6728&eid=4909

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Pavol Vican <vican.pavol@gmail.com>;
Date Reported: 2017-01-16
Verified by: Benoit Claise (IESG)

Section: 6

Original Text
-------------
  pattern "\S+";

...

  pattern "\S(.*\S)?";

Corrected Text
--------------
  pattern '\S+';

...

  pattern '\S(.*\S)?';



Notes
-----
RFC 7950 in section 6.1.3 says that backslash has special meaning if it is in the double-quoted string. The only characters immediately following the backslash are n, t, \, ". Other characters are forbidden. This can be solved using single-quoted string or double backslash.

--------------------------------------
RFC6728 (draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-11)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols
Publication Date    : October 2012
Author(s)           : G. Muenz, B. Claise, P. Aitken
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : IP Flow Information Export
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG