[IPFIX] Search comments and feedbacks about the draft of IPFIX IE extension when considering BGP community

"Ariel Gu" <gurong@chinamobile.com> Tue, 19 July 2016 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <gurong@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CFA12DFFE for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 07:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.886
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.886 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PTShXGzvOe7x for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 07:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta1.chinamobile.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE6512D7A1 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 06:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app03-12003 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee3578e2ce6806-7f751; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 21:36:38 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee3578e2ce6806-7f751
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from GuRong (unknown[]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr02-12002 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee2578e2cd9424-9bd52; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 21:36:36 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee2578e2cd9424-9bd52
From: "Ariel Gu" <gurong@chinamobile.com>
To: <ipfix@ietf.org>, <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>, <quittek@neclab.eu>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 21:36:22 +0800
Message-ID: <002501d1e1c2$8fb45440$af1cfcc0$@chinamobile.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0026_01D1E205.9DDAA180"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AdHhwQAzrrzPYddvQI6OGd6/fgM2+Q==
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/V1UOxYrusnNKsBzbHz_tJCmMvHA>
Cc: lizhenqiang <lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com>
Subject: [IPFIX] Search comments and feedbacks about the draft of IPFIX IE extension when considering BGP community
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:18:20 -0000

Hi, dear all.

Nice meeting you in the mail-list of IPFIX. This IETF in Berlin right now,
we submit a draft and present it about the IPFIX IE extension when
considering BGP community. I'm looking for comments and feedbacks about our
idea in new IE added in exporting the flow information correlated with BGP
community. As dear chair told me that the mail-list is still alive, I follow
the suggestion of putting my draft here and searching for advice and
suggestions in the right place. 


Before that, I made a short summary of my draft which may be helpful in
quick looking at the draft. When we consider traffic steering in our
backbone network, we feel that the flow information based on BGP community
is quite suitable. That's the reason why we write the draft. And we now
recommend two IEs which may be assigned by IANA: bgpSourceCommunityList and


If you are facing up with this situations as us, then we can discuss about
the IEs especially the details. 


The information of my draft:


I'm looking forward for your comments.

Best regards and have a nice trip in Berlin.


Rong Gu
China Mobile Research Institute
No.32 Xuanwumen West Street, Xicheng District
Beijing, China, 100053
Mobile: +86 13811520541
Phone: +86 10 15801696688 Ext. 36211
Email:  <mailto:huanglu@chinamobile.com> gurong@chinamobile.com