Re: [IPFIX] IETF 81: New work for IPFIX ...
ATSUSHI KOBAYASHI <akoba@orange.plala.or.jp> Thu, 23 June 2011 08:32 UTC
Return-Path: <akoba@orange.plala.or.jp>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839C811E8083 for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62iWtX5p32DB for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msa03b.plala.or.jp (msa03.plala.or.jp [58.93.240.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A4311E8077 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 01:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (really [114.184.177.87]) by msa03b.plala.or.jp with ESMTP id <20110623083213.REQX27506.msa03b.plala.or.jp@[127.0.0.1]>; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:32:13 +0900
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:32:16 +0900
From: ATSUSHI KOBAYASHI <akoba@orange.plala.or.jp>
To: Nevil Brownlee <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>
In-Reply-To: <4DFECECB.4010000@auckland.ac.nz>
References: <4DFECECB.4010000@auckland.ac.nz>
Message-Id: <20110623173216.3BFB.C996B02F@orange.plala.or.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.53 [ja]
X-VirusScan: Outbound; msa03b; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:32:19 +0900
Cc: IPFIX Working Group <ipfix@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] IETF 81: New work for IPFIX ...
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipfix>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:32:23 -0000
Hi all, Although I can not attend IETF session any more, I will be ready for several items from far Japan. On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:38:35 +1200 Nevil Brownlee <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz> wrote: > > Hi all: > > It looks as though the flow-selection draft will be ready to submit > before the Quebec IETF meeting, so it's time to start discussion > on new charter items. Looking back at the minutes from IETF 80 in > Prague, possible items are: > > 1. New versions of the base standards, 5101 and 5102, which implement > small changes that did not affect interoperation, (for example > adding detail where there are gaps in 5101) as a Standards Track > successor to 5101. Once that had been published as an RFC > for some time we could work on moving it to Draft; that should be > possible in a reasonably short time. > > 2. IE Doctors, a draft that "lays out the ground rules for developing > new IPFIX Information Elements, and clarifies how the IE Registry > process works." The issues here are > a. Should we develop an 'IE Guidelines' draft? > b. Do we want to have an 'IE Doctors' team (with IESG overview), > an expanded group of IE Expert reviewers, or what? > > 3. IPFIX Aggregation. This seems (to me) to be a required function > for IPFIX Mediation. I will reviews it. > > 4. IPFIX Mediation protocol draft. I will support it. > > 5. Exporting MIB variables using IPFIX draft. I will reviews it. > > For any of these that we adopt as new work items, I'd like to know > - who is prepared to work on writing/editing? (at least 2 people) > - who is prepared to review these drafts as they change from time > to time? (at least three people) > If you are prepared to do either of these, please email me a list > of which item numbers in the list above you're willing to write/edit > and/or to review. How about the following draft as work item? Monitoring link layer section is required for expanding IPFIX. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kashima-ipfix-data-link-layer-monitoring-05 Regards, Atsushi > > So, do please send your comments on these to the list, so that we > can have an informed discussion in Quebec City. > > Cheers, Nevil (IPFIX co-chair) > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Nevil Brownlee Computer Science Department | ITS > Phone: +64 9 373 7599 x88941 The University of Auckland > FAX: +64 9 373 7453 Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand > _______________________________________________ > IPFIX mailing list > IPFIX@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix -- KOBAYASHI ATSUSHI <akoba@orange.plala.or.jp>
- [IPFIX] IETF 81: New work for IPFIX ... Nevil Brownlee
- Re: [IPFIX] IETF 81: New work for IPFIX ... Benoit Claise
- Re: [IPFIX] IETF 81: New work for IPFIX ... ATSUSHI KOBAYASHI