Re: [IPFIX] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5102 (4984)

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Thu, 06 April 2017 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9250D1294FB for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 06:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ofG4LzjqgNyM for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 06:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x241.google.com (mail-wr0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 180391294F5 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 06:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x241.google.com with SMTP id t20so11557919wra.2 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 06:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+/bBxWgoijxrmW0454YNH0Hgks5LJQ1X2YMGZZI/7XQ=; b=EWoWRdOvk9knUc6/QZy1LgYnXvI09PFwRbUd4Ave4sfhULyLGZ92MC85q20w2d1Lkb SQYhSBd/uDFOkDPFecz1FaTqVUXVvfl0lZaaUz2ebF4JWrUfWTR0Yx7mTalcFgZYPXM5 uVcdNVcMWN3Df1IIKad7cnzvse2pk2F9fE7lxjgfuvHgMaBgNshdhAkS1mBuq6PGejZy nFkbkYfMDoczsf//WEgu+lapt6k5DZb6CeqhMHoRvAc2T50/FVd4yWd0mzpW88yVXQ4s lAzJzK055PlK0jCEZ18MIZDMfV27zP8alN3xylYKFJCrJlRscsKQTpKEWzaV4OjvM7P8 A0RA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+/bBxWgoijxrmW0454YNH0Hgks5LJQ1X2YMGZZI/7XQ=; b=cdAPDxCYwNdZeR9Skv+rFKHqm1K0YDesrdzcuCbAzZtNAFyB35HCVXK4lT7i8G/snk Z+jwa8zTxNT9WHkrudpeGxTKC9H1EYxaXzgROm/+v4naihMoXkTi4m3VdBIDF4wjfu1E yUzURQDW9w5CLJaAnQOfbSGe6qs9r8Fs8vqV2Ugs1ox7L5jO+QOfTN6mYJGeSLEZpbTM IwAYrN980xrG/aEUx/MCBTwvX2N40MJkS+jajl0qWa+xPAgTquC8OVJLlPriXmWyCuxq rp3ZesbiwbdyEOEXSjc/nPed/VfeGO+zNHodR/z67Rrw5paTUDFvHqXjgCNO3cqY0yrX MPaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3cg1L3QrtNpyT4onsAM1wJSlE0xuI6OMgopGPgjY7kIDHwTUWhavHWe5VasBvzog==
X-Received: by 10.28.232.14 with SMTP id f14mr14556407wmh.106.1491486306771; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 06:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 32sm2220002wrq.25.2017.04.06.06.45.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Apr 2017 06:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
To: Andrew Feren <andrew.feren@plixer.com>, PJ Aitken <pjaitken@brocade.com>, "quittek@netlab.nec.de" <quittek@netlab.nec.de>, "stbryant@cisco.com" <stbryant@cisco.com>, "bclaise@cisco.com" <bclaise@cisco.com>, "paitken@cisco.com" <paitken@cisco.com>, "jemeyer@paypal.com" <jemeyer@paypal.com>, "joelja@bogus.com" <joelja@bogus.com>, "n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz" <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>, "quittek@neclab.eu" <quittek@neclab.eu>
References: <20170330124555.41C72B81373@rfc-editor.org> <8e179988-db1d-3419-3be4-b120ff6eb329@brocade.com> <481e0cd9-530a-d9ab-d8f3-e02f99f65821@gmail.com> <c8b7025e-923c-b5cb-dc85-4a5eda2c70eb@brocade.com> <8E7542283B89BB4DB672EB49CEE5AAB7BEC809A1@PLXRDC01.plxr.local>
Cc: "ipfix@ietf.org" <ipfix@ietf.org>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2c308d8c-a6b8-69da-2385-34cdaae46f1d@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 14:45:04 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8E7542283B89BB4DB672EB49CEE5AAB7BEC809A1@PLXRDC01.plxr.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/euUoc6ck-I3bs0KVhQZExiJFSk8>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5102 (4984)
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 13:45:13 -0000

It depends on what IANA think, but it's only about an hour to write and 
the reviews will all go though on the nod.

Of course as an AD Benoit may just be able to direct that that this 
obvious correction happens.

Stewart


On 06/04/2017 14:23, Andrew Feren wrote:
> What about an errata on 5102 with a note that that the definitions have moved to the registry?  Seems like an odd end run, but if it solves the problem...
>
> -Andrew
>
> ________________________________________
> From: IPFIX [ipfix-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of PJ Aitken [pjaitken@brocade.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2017 5:37 AM
> To: Stewart Bryant; quittek@netlab.nec.de; stbryant@cisco.com; bclaise@cisco.com; paitken@cisco.com; jemeyer@paypal.com; joelja@bogus.com; n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz; quittek@neclab.eu
> Cc: ipfix@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [IPFIX] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5102 (4984)
>
> That would be possible, though it seems like a lot of effort for the
> addition of two clarifying words, "least significant" ?
>
> P.
>
>
> On 06/04/17 10:29, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>> Paul
>>
>> If necessary you could write a one page RFC asking IANA to add a note
>> to the registry.
>>
>> Stewart
>>
>>
>> On 05/04/2017 19:16, PJ Aitken wrote:
>>> I should point out that although RFC 5102 has been obsoleted by RFC
>>> 7012, 7012 doesn't actually contain any Information Element
>>> definitions; it simply points to IANA's IPFIX registry as the
>>> normative reference for Element definitions.
>>>
>>> So the issue doesn't arise in 7012, and I suspect it's not possible
>>> to raise an errata against the registry.
>>>
>>> P.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30/03/17 13:45, RFC Errata System wrote:
>>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5102,
>>>> "Information Model for IP Flow Information Export".
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> You may review the report below and at:
>>>> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url%3fu%3dhttps-3A__www.rfc-2Deditor.org_errata-5Fsearch.php-3Frfc-3D5102-26eid-3D4984%26d%3dDwIC-g%26c%3dIL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg%26r%3dl3qN-NVkUTPhhRxKVpFXRDjrG3WNcj_6aGqXB9E7JYU%26m%3dlbHlVRM8W9dbZUz-UVd1z1hzVa3rIiNL-6zIIFo8oMo%26s%3dqFdcGTGJe09BgcdUjB6EszW7hMzekalZnfj8wx5JlNw%26e%3d&c=E,1,POSFjbIcmfzya-gNUP5rX4D4UfQQg4AwYC59vms0nF1wQWLNUVnaAiF5ob6Uae9OGK7KJmApL2_YmgpwUhW4gYwEcADORoaJSQoTSL3CL1vf&typo=1
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> Type: Technical
>>>> Reported by: Paul Aitken <pjaitken@brocade.com>;
>>>>
>>>> Section: 5.2.10, appA
>>>>
>>>> Original Text
>>>> -------------
>>>> Each bit represents an Information Element in the Data Record
>>>> with the n-th bit
>>>> representing the n-th Information Element.
>>>>
>>>> Corrected Text
>>>> --------------
>>>> Each bit represents an Information Element in the Data Record,
>>>> with the n-th least significant bit
>>>> representing the n-th Information Element.
>>>>
>>>> Notes
>>>> -----
>>>> A misunderstand arose as to whether bits were assigned in host order
>>>> or network order - so clarify that the bits are assigned from the
>>>> least significant to the most significant, ie right-to-left rather
>>>> than left-to-right.
>>>>
>>>> Moreover, this clarification applies to IANA's IPFIX registry.
>>>>
>>>> NB RFC 8038 re-uses this definition for mibIndexIndicator.
>>>> Consistency between the definitions is desirable.
>>>>
>>>> Instructions:
>>>> -------------
>>>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>>>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>>>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>>>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> RFC5102 (draft-ietf-ipfix-info-15)
>>>> --------------------------------------
>>>> Title               : Information Model for IP Flow Information Export
>>>> Publication Date    : January 2008
>>>> Author(s)           : J. Quittek, S. Bryant, B. Claise, P. Aitken,
>>>> J. Meyer
>>>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>>>> Source              : IP Flow Information Export
>>>> Area                : Operations and Management
>>>> Stream              : IETF
>>>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> IPFIX mailing list
>>>> IPFIX@ietf.org
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> IPFIX mailing list
>>> IPFIX@ietf.org
>>> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url%3fu%3dhttps-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_ipfix%26d%3dDwIC-g%26c%3dIL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg%26r%3dl3qN-NVkUTPhhRxKVpFXRDjrG3WNcj_6aGqXB9E7JYU%26m%3dlbHlVRM8W9dbZUz-UVd1z1hzVa3rIiNL-6zIIFo8oMo%26s%3d2CAUPZ9aGFiHyUVUtn2cZFp3fcwj4DUALHp38x4XnC8%26e%3d&c=E,1,pcYrfKgiAK5NJHIqb30BLQrXBHi8Lo8-mgP6pHj3ho1uiEqr0t_tIoUPPm2W5esu67hb-exkoIxDnLvptn6Fk1XN_eXkMZbhZslQnOteFYgZtZG7_ZC0ruA,&typo=1
>>
> _______________________________________________
> IPFIX mailing list
> IPFIX@ietf.org
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix&c=E,1,usIqknq8V3E9Vc_Br3gQ45teOaNlF3LfzLHNrQfB4rcp1FD80k14Pk3JVl_c5gVkoOA2yrwp8SRtE_kUr0YLtIlWtEs33OppFfZ7Xp_6PNt-XItuFw,,&typo=1