Re: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5610 (4731)
Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> Wed, 06 July 2016 06:27 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F3612D59D for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 23:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.328
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.328 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Km3DD06UAlm for <ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 23:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trammell.ch (trammell.ch [5.148.172.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECBF12D544 for <ipfix@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 23:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:26:9c2::7ea] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:26:9c2::7ea]) by trammell.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E1071A03B4; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 08:27:30 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_56AF7DF4-E770-44F8-9F5E-ED31067F50D1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20160706062440.C723CB80E00@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 08:27:32 +0200
Message-Id: <F01C76E8-D82D-4D07-9C62-080A7E431DFD@trammell.ch>
References: <20160706062440.C723CB80E00@rfc-editor.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipfix/i30s9KOflrSwkJg6fdX07NVzuaY>
Cc: "ipfix@ietf.org Group" <ipfix@ietf.org>, sb.logarajan@gmail.com, Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Nevil Brownlee <n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5610 (4731)
X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list <ipfix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipfix/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipfix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix>, <mailto:ipfix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 06:27:34 -0000
(removing emails I know to be no longer functional) > On 06 Jul 2016, at 08:24, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5610, > "Exporting Type Information for IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5610&eid=4731 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Logarajan <sb.logarajan@gmail.com> > > Section: Appendix A > > Original Text > ------------- > 1 2 3 > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Set ID = 3 | Length = 26 | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Template ID = 257 | Field Count = 4 | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Scope Field Count = 2 |0| priv.EnterpriseNumber 346 | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Field Length = 4 |0| informationElementId 303 | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Field Length = 2 |0| inf.El.DataType 339 | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Field Length = 1 |0| inf.El.Semantics 344 | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Field Length = 1 |0| inf.El.Name 341 | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Field Length = 65536 | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > Corrected Text > -------------- > 1 2 3 > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Set ID = 3 | Length = 26 | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Template ID = 257 | Field Count = 5 | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Scope Field Count = 2 |0| priv.EnterpriseNumber 346 | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Field Length = 4 |0| informationElementId 303 | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Field Length = 2 |0| inf.El.DataType 339 | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Field Length = 1 |0| inf.El.Semantics 344 | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Field Length = 1 |0| inf.El.Name 341 | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Field Length = 65536 | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > > Notes > ----- > Field count should be 5. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. Yes, this is correct. Also, Length = 26 should be Length = 30, since the length is consistent with the field count. (Do we need to file a new erratum for this?) Cheers, Brian > -------------------------------------- > RFC5610 (draft-ietf-ipfix-exporting-type-05) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Exporting Type Information for IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information Elements > Publication Date : July 2009 > Author(s) : E. Boschi, B. Trammell, L. Mark, T. Zseby > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : IP Flow Information Export > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > IPFIX mailing list > IPFIX@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
- [IPFIX] [Errata Verified] RFC5610 (4731) RFC Errata System
- Re: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5610 (… Benoit Claise
- [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5610 (4731) RFC Errata System
- Re: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5610 (… Brian Trammell